Then went outside to watch P. parade

[Alan J. Ford]

We have Buell Frazier stating he does not know the identity of the Prayer Man. That proves it's not Stanton. --Mr. Plant

An astute observation, no great surprise considering the keen source. Some people just get it, and then there's some people desperately clinging to self-serving horse manure masquerading as evidence.

[Alan J. Ford]

Not side-stepping, Mr. Graves' question, just feel it's a private matter between him and Mr. Iacoletti to come to a sense of resolution about. That said, my apologies, just occurred to me that after I made the assertion that the wrongly accused only weighed 131lbs rather than the much heavier individual Marrion Baker actually encountered, I didn't share a supportive link to substantiate my assertion.

So, here's that official documentation ---->

https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=961#relPageId=389&tab=page

The wrongly accused is nowhere near the same size as the actual MUCH heavier individual Marrion Baker actually encounters Re: his same day affidavit.

[Chris Davidson]

Davidson photoshopped a smeared distorted face that looks like a deformed muppet. That is not evidence. You're trying to claim it's a "woman's face" for your preposterous theory. That same deformed muppet face you try to claim is Stanton. That's only your opinion and is not evidence.

Here’s a brief history lesson for those that choose not to remain ignorant of the facts.
Sean Murphy approached me.
He was working on a project in regards to Lovelady/Oswald.
I pointed out there was a person in the shadows.
The source was from the DVD “Death In Dealy Plaza” which I had obtained in 2006.
I copied the DVD for Robin Unger and eventually sent it to him, hence Sean’s reference to him.
No-one from any of the forums knew of this shadow person.
How could they unless they were actually looking in that particular location with a decent Wiegman copy.
That’s why I believe it wasn’t until approx five years later that Sean(advanced his theory) or someone in contact with, followed up with posting prayer man related info.
I used the same PHOTOSHOP process as I used in the Bell film (Charles Hester in a poor quality, shadowed  background-(Groden version) entering the colonnade) to enhance shadow person.
It is now possible to sync Wiegman/Bell for timing purposes in regards to Baker.
At some point, Duncan enhanced one of the two Wiegman frames I already Photoshopped.
That frame(Duncan’s enhanced version) is the one credited to me.
This is incorrect and the ignorant POS’s who don’t understand the provenance should STFU, stop commenting and get their stories straight.
I had no interest in who shadow person was at the time(nor do I care now, only to the extent of trying to enhance that person from the shadows) and was helping Sean out with a project as a fellow researcher.
The same methods were applied to both frames and I commented that the other (not the Duncan selected version) looks like a woman to me.
That would be the first version within the supplied gif in case you’re not good with numbers, Duncan enhanced the last one in the gif.
Enough said.

[Ray Mitcham]

Has the site been compromised?
 We keep getting the message " dThe pellet with the poison's in the flagon with the dragon, the vessel with the pestle has the brew that is true.ormed" in various postings. Or is it some kind of silly prank?

[John Mytton]

Has the site been compromised?
 We keep getting the message " dThe pellet with the poison's in the flagon with the dragon, the vessel with the pestle has the brew that is true.ormed" in various postings. Or is it some kind of silly prank?

I think the phrase is supposed to replace swear words but it doesn't appear to be working correctly.
The word re-futation which is definitely not a swear word is not possible without the hyphen.

JohnM

[Rick Plant]

Has the site been compromised?
 We keep getting the message " dThe pellet with the poison's in the flagon with the dragon, the vessel with the pestle has the brew that is true.ormed" in various postings. Or is it some kind of silly prank?

I was getting that too and I was like WTF? 

Even if you delete it and type it again it comes back. Maybe it has to do with site going down with the new server.   

I think the phrase is supposed to replace swear words but it doesn't appear to be working correctly.
The word re-futation which is dThe pellet with the poison's in the flagon with the dragon, the vessel with the pestle has the brew that is true.initely not a swear word is not possible without the hyphen.

JohnM

Never saw that bThe pellet with the poison's in the flagon with the dragon, the vessel with the pestle has the brew that is true.ore and I wasn't swearing when I posted lol.

It replaces what you type. 

[John Iacoletti]

Ok, Duncan fixed it.

brief before reference effectual