This is how the rifle was gotten into the building

[Alan Ford]

#1:



#2:



#3:



#4:



Poor Mr Lidell! 

[Gerry Down]

How wide was the backseat in total?

[Ray Mitcham]

How wide was the backseat in total?

Why does that matter?

[Gerry Down]

Why does that matter?

The wider the back seat,the harder it would be to judge the length of the package from memory. I think some of those old back seats were 55 to 60 inches wide. That would mean the end of the package would end up somewhere around the middle of the seat and so it would be easy for Frazier to be off either way of the middle of the seat.

[Martin Weidmann]

The wider the back seat,the harder it would be to judge the length of the package from memory. I think some of those old back seats were 55 to 60 inches wide. That would mean the end of the package would end up somewhere around the middle of the seat and so it would be easy for Frazier to be off either way of the middle of the seat.

Any crappy argument will do to get a broken MC rifle to fit inside a paper bag. Take a step back and take a deep breath. It might help you to see and understand just how silly this argument truly is.

[Alan Ford]

Any crappy argument will do to get a broken MC rifle to fit inside a paper bag. Take a step back and take a deep breath. It might help you to see and understand just how silly this argument truly is.

Ain't gonna happen, Mr Weidmann----------these guys' devotion and gullibility are all-consuming!   

[Richard Smith]

Again, Oswald himself denied carrying any long package.  So unless you begin with the premise that Oswald lied it doesn't really matter what Frazier said.  To cling to Frazier's estimate as being absolutely precise entails needing to explain why Oswald denied carrying any such package.  If it didn't contain the rifle because it was too short per Frazier, then why does Oswald lie about it?  This where the kooks stick their head in the sand and make claims like there is no recording of the Oswald's interrogation.  The old impossible standard of proof trick where any evidence they can't rebut is rejected as the product of lies or fakery - but without any evidence of such.  The great circle of lunacy that allows them to make an allegation, not support it with any logical explanation, and then wave away evidence to the contrary as a product of the frame up.