More of your nonsense born out of a need to respond to every post; not ashamed that you contribute nothing of substance to this forum: Just denials of the historical record unsupported by any evidence.
Very disappointing, John. I spend hours producing superb Vids and they fail to penetrate your devilish, closed mind.
The one who is in denial is you. You have convinced yourself by cherry-picking the evidence and made up your mind to the extend that you are unwilling to even consider anything that contradicts your opinion and/or the serious problems there are with the historical record. The points John raised are valid, but rather than deal with them you start attacking John. That's a massive demonstration of weakness on your part. And it isn't the first time you have displayed that same weakness.
When I ask you two simple questions you can't give a credible answer to, you run away, saying;
I'll have to delay my response, Martin.
Business is more important than answering immaterial questions.
But now, here your are, replying to other posts in the same thread and completely ignoring the two questions I asked.
Did you think I would let you get away with that? Here are my two questions again;
1.
What in the world could have possibly been so important to Oswald that he needed to get to a go-nowhere location as 10%/Patton (where he would stand out like a sore thumb) as quickly as he could? Apart from jogging, have you ever run to a place where there was nothing to do or see? And if he was tansported in a car, why not pick a location like Jefferson to be dropped of where there was a lot more activity (less chance of being noticed) and bus stops all over the place?
It's easier to hide in the open in a crowd of people than on an empty street, right?
2.
I never said it was not Oswald's revolver. I can't say that simply because I do not know. But you don't get to assume that it was Oswald's revolver. You need to prove it... and John has already explained the problem with the chain of custody for the revolver. All we really know is that Gerald Hill, at the police station, pulled a revolver out of his pocket some 2 hours after Oswald's arrest, had a few officers mark it and and submitted into evidence.
Where did Hill get that revolver and how do we know it's the same one they took from Oswald at the Texas Theater?Are you going to man up to at least try to answer the questions or are you going to run away again.... Your choice!
