Back and to the right?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Back and to the right?  (Read 38570 times)

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Back and to the right?
« Reply #70 on: May 18, 2020, 05:55:28 AM »
A drawing depicting the posterior head wound of President Kennedy, made from an autopsy photograph. The small nearly circular posterior scalp wound is at the end of the hair part, near the end of the ruler, and immediately to the right of it.

Possibility----The muscle spasm/jet effect could have still happened even if a shot was actually from the front.
We have seen the forward motion of JFKs head at 312-313......



Possibility---- simultaneous shots from in front and behind [could have been from a variety of rear locations]
Some witnesses described the last shot as 'pa-pow'. 
The presidents brain went mysteriously missing...a suspiciously ludicrous shame.
Where is that autopsy photo from where the above drawing was depicted?

Offline David Monaghan

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: Back and to the right?
« Reply #71 on: May 23, 2020, 04:19:33 AM »
Kennedy had a back brace on which would contribute to him staying in a upright position regardless of the firing position imo. Re a head shot from the rear from the TSBD half his face would have been blown off due to the steep angle, instead like the parkland doctors stated , he had a large blow out to the back off the head, case closed right enough.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Back and to the right?
« Reply #72 on: May 28, 2020, 06:38:36 AM »
   What you guys are referring to as a "SNAP" is actually a very Minor "Tilt" or "Tipping" of JFK's Head.  A tree limb "SNAPS". Or, "You can "SNAP" Into a Slim Jim. Oh Yeah"! We see Nothing close to this with regard to the head of JFK.


The exita follows the direction of the missile
At least in this universe



Kennedy's head movement forward approximates the recoil of a 91/41 Carcano (+ tester's head)
Thus Newton's Third Law of Motion can be realized (the equal & opposite reaction thing)
« Last Edit: May 28, 2020, 06:38:04 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: Back and to the right?
« Reply #73 on: May 28, 2020, 07:06:23 AM »

The exita follows the direction of the missile
At least in this universe

Very convincing to a rational observer, unless, of course, Greer just happened to slam on the brakes at that very moment, or ... or ... or ...

IF THE ZAPRUDER FILM WAS ALTERED!

--  MWT  ;)
« Last Edit: May 28, 2020, 07:08:17 AM by Thomas Graves »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Back and to the right?
« Reply #74 on: May 28, 2020, 07:19:44 AM »
Very convincing to a rational observer, unless, of course, Greer just happened to slam on the brakes at that very moment, or ... or ... or ...

IF THE ZAPRUDER FILM WAS ALTERED!

--  MWT  ;)

Even more convincing to a physicist, I shouldn't wonder.

Take another look at my post and notice I've added a gun nut firing a Carcano and which just happens to confirm  the equal and opposite reaction of Kennedy's head movement. Reminds one of Sir Isaac Newton's 3rd Law (hey, another 3!) of Motion, eh wot?
« Last Edit: May 28, 2020, 08:00:39 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: Back and to the right?
« Reply #75 on: May 28, 2020, 08:16:58 AM »
Even more convincing to a physicist, I shouldn't wonder.

Take another look at my post and notice I've added a gun nut firing a Carcano and which just happens to confirm  the equal and opposite reaction of Kennedy's head movement. Reminds one of Sir Isaac Newton's 3rd Law (hey, another 3!) of Motion, eh wot?

Yes.

Exactly [   .  ] inches.

--  MWT  ;)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Back and to the right?
« Reply #76 on: May 28, 2020, 02:10:19 PM »
Yes.

Exactly [   .  ] inches.

--  MWT  ;)

Approx 2.5" I heard

Now let's see some Oswald Arse Kisser pull an 'lol' and call Sir Isaac Newton an expert "expert"


« Last Edit: May 28, 2020, 06:11:44 PM by Bill Chapman »