Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Am I the only CT here who can meet the LN's more than half way? If not ...  (Read 40464 times)

Offline Dan DAlimonte

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 171
Re: Am I the only CT here who can meet the LN's more than half way? If not ...
« Reply #40 on: February 15, 2018, 12:18:18 AM »
Advertisement
I'd suggest that you lack what it takes to face the truth.....   You recognize that we have not been told the truth and the government covered up the truth....but you can't come to grips with that .

My truth has Oswald being involved and ALL assassins were captured that day
and the government did everything they could to make it appear like he acted alone.
Your's ...? 

Oswald was impressionable, he was playing the role of a TV character,
he was stupid enough to take a hoax shot at Kennedy so he could enter Cuba as a hero,
never thinking his handlers would kill Kennedy and blame him?  Is that correct?

And you say to me I have to get a grip?
« Last Edit: February 15, 2018, 01:13:49 AM by Dan DAlimonte »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Am I the only CT here who can meet the LN's more than half way? If not ...
« Reply #40 on: February 15, 2018, 12:18:18 AM »


Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Am I the only CT here who can meet the LN's more than half way? If not ...
« Reply #41 on: February 15, 2018, 12:27:51 AM »
My truth has Oswald being involved and ALL assassins were captured that day
and the government did everything they could to make it appear like he acted alone.
Your's ...?

the government did everything they could to make it appear like he acted alone.

You're right.....   Is that the way is should be?, according to our constitution and Bill of Rights.

Offline Dan DAlimonte

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 171
Re: Am I the only CT here who can meet the LN's more than half way? If not ...
« Reply #42 on: February 15, 2018, 12:32:02 AM »
the government did everything they could to make it appear like he acted alone.

You're right.....   Is that the way is should be?, according to our constitution and Bill of Rights.

Hell, no.  Unless they had a damn good reason.  Imagine if I was right about the other assassins being captured and they were domestic agents or foreign ones either from a pro or anti Castro group. 
What do you think the government should have done in such a situation?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Am I the only CT here who can meet the LN's more than half way? If not ...
« Reply #42 on: February 15, 2018, 12:32:02 AM »


Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 833
Re: Am I the only CT here who can meet the LN's more than half way? If not ...
« Reply #43 on: February 15, 2018, 12:54:51 AM »

What is your best Oswald was involved, theory?
Btw ... that's ... INVOLVED.

Not that he was duped and Not that he was really there to protect the President.
INVOLVED.

Let the sound of crickets begin.

My best Oswald was involved theory (hypothesis) is..

LHO was a wannabe gov agent that was groomed to be a patsy in the "Fake Defector Program" created by James "The Ghost" Angleton. After the Bay of Pigs fiasco, JFK fired American Nazi Allen Dulles who was the architect of the "Big Event". Angleton recruited Hoover (with the "photo") and it was game on. Hoover was the mob boss at the time and when Dulles got fired JFK sealed his fate.

Being a member of the fake defector program, Oswald knew he was being cut off from society and painted as a commie for his mission. How much he knew about his mission was irrelevant. For if he was part of a conspiracy then there is no way in hell the conspirators would have relied on him to be the shooter. He was the patsy, not the shooter. Which means the MC was planted and not the murder weapon. LHO may have been heavily involved, but he was NOT a lone nut assassin. Like he said, he was a patsy because every good conspiracy needs one and he was it.
« Last Edit: February 15, 2018, 12:59:26 AM by Jack Trojan »

Offline Dan DAlimonte

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 171
Re: Am I the only CT here who can meet the LN's more than half way? If not ...
« Reply #44 on: February 15, 2018, 01:33:14 AM »
My best Oswald was involved theory (hypothesis) is..

LHO was a wannabe gov agent that was groomed to be a patsy in the "Fake Defector Program" created by James "The Ghost" Angleton. After the Bay of Pigs fiasco, JFK fired American Nazi Allen Dulles who was the architect of the "Big Event". Angleton recruited Hoover (with the "photo") and it was game on. Hoover was the mob boss at the time and when Dulles got fired JFK sealed his fate.

Being a member of the fake defector program, Oswald knew he was being cut off from society and painted as a commie for his mission. How much he knew about his mission was irrelevant. For if he was part of a conspiracy then there is no way in hell the conspirators would have relied on him to be the shooter. He was the patsy, not the shooter. Which means the MC was planted and not the murder weapon. LHO may have been heavily involved, but he was NOT a lone nut assassin. Like he said, he was a patsy because every good conspiracy needs one and he was it.

Hey, Jack.  Well, you're the third person to offer an Oswald was involved theory.
So, you're saying he left the building because he caught on he was a patsy or was that
part of the plan?
« Last Edit: February 15, 2018, 02:08:15 AM by Dan DAlimonte »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Am I the only CT here who can meet the LN's more than half way? If not ...
« Reply #44 on: February 15, 2018, 01:33:14 AM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Am I the only CT here who can meet the LN's more than half way? If not ...
« Reply #45 on: February 15, 2018, 03:22:33 AM »
Why do you think Oswald was needed as a patsy? All that was needed was a rifle tied to Castro. Why do you think you understand my thinking on what happened? Did I say there was a shot from the front? Did I say multiple shooters? Why do you guys assume you know what critics of the official story think?

It's way easier for them to make up positions to argue with.
« Last Edit: February 15, 2018, 03:28:39 AM by John Iacoletti »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Am I the only CT here who can meet the LN's more than half way? If not ...
« Reply #46 on: February 15, 2018, 03:26:35 AM »
You can't negotiate the truth in a factual matter to meet someone halfway.  The totality of facts and evidence in this case demonstrate beyond any doubt that Oswald was the assassin.

LOL.  In Richard's fantasy world.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Am I the only CT here who can meet the LN's more than half way? If not ...
« Reply #46 on: February 15, 2018, 03:26:35 AM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Am I the only CT here who can meet the LN's more than half way? If not ...
« Reply #47 on: February 15, 2018, 03:33:37 AM »
Marina Oswald, affidavit, 11/22/63...

"I opened the blanket and saw a rifle in it."

"Ilya Mamantov, affidavit, 11/22/63".

There, I fixed it for you.  Other interesting facts from that affidavit:

- Lee worked at a place on Hines
- Lee used to have a rifle in Russia
- The rifle he had was a dark gun
- She did not remember a sight on it
- She wasn't sure if it was the same rifle that the police showed her