Or none of the above....
North Beckley and Irving only come into play if Oswald did in fact have a rifle in his possession on 11/21/63. You can assume that he did, but nobody can prove it.
Unless you are going to nominate a location for Oswald's Carcano rifle: You're a contrarian.
When compiling physical evidence: Often a conclusion is made based on a series of previous events and/or statements by relatives, friends, acquaintances, neighbors or co-workers.
-- Marina Oswald testified that Lee Oswald had a rifle at Neely Street Dallas.
-- Marina Oswald testified that she took the backyard photos of Lee Oswald with a rifle (and pistol).
-- Marina Oswald testified that Lee Oswald had a rifle in New Orleans.
-- Marina Oswald testified that Lee Oswald had a rifle stored in a blanket in the Paine's garage.
-- Marina Oswald nearly fainted when the Police Officer held the blanket and it hung limp over his arm. No rifle in the blanket (afternoon of 22 November1963).
-- Marina Oswald spoke about "the fateful rifle" of Lee Oswald.
Not enough for ya [sic] Sherlock Weidmann?
I assume you are expecting someone to verify where Oswald's Carcano rifle was regularly... perhaps ever day from late March 1963 to the evening of 21 November 1963? The date, location written down in a diary with a detailed description of the gun; serial number etc. This is unrealistic and would never be required in a criminal trial.
Nobody can prove it.... ha, ha!If you're child, wife, brother, sister, father or mother was murdered and the police arrested some person who was the last to be seen with him or her: You'd be enraged if the cops didn't arrest the suspect.
Or would you say:
"No, no, no Captain let the guy go. Unless you have photographic evidence and seven witnesses, that man is inoooooocent".Well?
Oh, if you were asked to participate in a television documentary about the JFK assassination (on camera) would you speak the sort of nonsense you write here?