Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.  (Read 76901 times)

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #328 on: March 09, 2020, 03:07:22 AM »
Advertisement
Did Studebaker fingerprint CE142 before the rifle was found?

I don't know. Probably not.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #328 on: March 09, 2020, 03:07:22 AM »


Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3724
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #329 on: March 09, 2020, 03:30:03 AM »
The bag was carried at full length in order to limit any further smearing of prints.
Quote
Mr. BALL - What did the package look like?
Mr. FRAZIER - Well, I will be frank with you, I would just, it is right as you get out of the grocery store, just more or less out of a package, you have seen some of these brown paper sacks you can obtain from any, most of the stores, some varieties, but it was a package just roughly about two feet long.
Quote
Mrs. RANDLE. What I remember seeing is about this long, sir, as I told you it was folded down so it could have been this long.
Mr. BALL. I see. You figure about 2 feet long, is that right?
Mrs. RANDLE. A little bit more.
Mr. BALL. A little more than 2 feet.
 
 


 

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #330 on: March 09, 2020, 03:47:25 AM »
I don't know. Probably not.

Do you think Studebaker opened it up, fingerprinted it, then refolded it and placed it in the SE corner prior to Johnson and Montgomery first noticing it?

If not then it has to be after the rifle was found. Do you agree?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #330 on: March 09, 2020, 03:47:25 AM »


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #331 on: March 09, 2020, 03:58:41 AM »
Do you think Studebaker opened it up, fingerprinted it, then refolded it and placed it in the SE corner prior to Johnson and Montgomery first noticing it?

If not then it has to be after the rifle was found. Do you agree?

He and Day got to the TSBD at 1:12 and the rifle was found at 1:22. That makes it unlikely that he dusted the bag before the rifle was found.

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #332 on: March 09, 2020, 04:32:37 AM »
He and Day got to the TSBD at 1:12 and the rifle was found at 1:22. That makes it unlikely that he dusted the bag before the rifle was found.

So you believe, like me, that the observation of the bag as variously described by Montgomery and Johnson took place after 1.22pm?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #332 on: March 09, 2020, 04:32:37 AM »


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #333 on: March 09, 2020, 05:08:34 AM »
So you believe, like me, that the observation of the bag as variously described by Montgomery and Johnson took place after 1.22pm?

I neither believe it nor disbelieve it. I simply don't know.

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #334 on: March 09, 2020, 05:27:16 AM »
Some more information about the discovery of CE142 from Montgomery in an interview for Larry Sneed's "No More Silence".



He recalled the bag was not in the position originally described to the WC in the various testimonies.

Another nugget from Montgomery......



Was CE142 really fingerprinted on the 6th floor before being taken out by Montgomery?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #334 on: March 09, 2020, 05:27:16 AM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #335 on: March 09, 2020, 05:46:20 AM »
Who are "the ones"......

Notice how Chapman never answered your question? It’s because he doesn’t even have basic knowledge of the case.

But he sure knows his YouTube movie clips.