The same old, tired defense attorney nonsense. So the bag was not strange but also not ordinary? You are going to dicker with whether it was "strange" vs "unusual"? Wow. Inspector Clouseau is on the case. Here is the definition of "strange": unusual or surprising in a way that is unsettling or hard to understand."
Let us apply that definition to this bag. It is three feet long, made by someone, empty, found at the scene of the crime (not just somewhere at Oswald's place of employment), with Oswald's prints on it, right next to the SN boxes also with his prints on it, on the same floor as Oswald's rifle, and near bullet casings fired from his rifle. It also is the only known such bag in the building as there are no similar bags depicted in any photos. No other TSBD employee has their prints on that bag. Just unlucky Lee. It's just a mystery bag from some unknown source that Oswald had the misfortune to touch because he worked there (even though no other employee touched it)! Double wow. That is low brow defense attorney nonsense where someone knows a client is stone cold guilty and is trying to convince just one rube juror that up is down. It doesn't work in the real world. Check your history books. It was and forever remains "Oswald's bag."
You make a poor excuse of a prosecutor. You don't even know the basics of a prosecution, so let me remind you.
Instead of constantly whining about the defense not agreeing with you and calling them names for pointing out the massive holes in your story, you actually need to prove your case. You can not simply say to the jury; "never mind all the little things that don't add up, just ignore that I don't have answers to some crucial questions and sometimes just make up stuff as I go along and most of all disregard all the evidence that does not point to the defendant, instead just believe the story, filled with speculations, conjecture and assumptions, I just conjured up".
That is low brow defense attorney nonsense where someone knows a client is stone cold guilty and is trying to convince just one rube juror that up is down. It doesn't work in the real world. No it doesn't. A defense attorney that knows a client is guilty can not mislead the court by claiming he is innocent. The mere fact that you do not know this, tells us all we need to know about your courtroom "expertise". Perhaps you should watch a bit less television or movies! And btw, trying to convince just one juror is exactly what the job of a defense lawyer is...... Byeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee, Richie
Check your history books. It was and forever remains "Oswald's bag." Huh? That's funny... my history book says that Oswald was the alleged killer but that his guilt was never established beyond a reasonable doubt. And there was nothing about a bag....
