Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.

[Gary Craig]

[Pat Speer]

Well, photo-manipulation techniques are available
I don't think you'd get that one by a sharp prosecutor
But thanks for the contribution nevertheless.

Beers, Allen, and Smith likely had their own watches
A precise time of 2:19 sounds like someone looked at their own watch

Wow. This is a truly awful post. First, you insult the late John Hunt--a well-respected researcher who supplied numerous images to Larry Sturdivan for his book--by implying he faked a photo for,,,what reason, was it? So he could contradict Trask?

And second, you totally misrepresent Trask. Trask said the tramp photos were taken AFTER 2:19, and the bag photos were taken after the tramp photos.

Try to do better. Especially if you're gonna go after Hunt.

[Bill Chapman]

Reality has a way of disturbing fantasies...

Wallyburger rearranges (disturbs) findings in the WR to create an ever-shifting, fabricated reality for himself.  This is tantamount to shifting the deck chairs on the Titanic: He's up shit creek without a paddle no matter what.

[Bill Chapman]

Wow. This is a truly awful post. First, you insult the late John Hunt--a well-respected researcher who supplied numerous images to Larry Sturdivan for his book--by implying he faked a photo for,,,what reason, was it? So he could contradict Trask?

And second, you totally misrepresent Trask. Trask said the tramp photos were taken AFTER 2:19, and the bag photos were taken after the tramp photos.

Try to do better. Especially if you're gonna go after Hunt.

Try to respond better
You'd face those (post#134) asks in court

The Long Brown Bag
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/bag.htm
'The bag was photographed being brought out the front of the Depository at 2:19 p.m. (Trask, Pictures of the Pain, p338)

[Colin Crow]

You make several unfounded ad hoc conclusions. And then call Day and Biffle liars because their eyewitness accounts don’t agree with your opinion.

The conclusions are not “ad hoc" and founded on analysis of the under oath testimonies of those present. Your inability to rebut the testimonies is duly noted. JohnM reposted the image with the title “Oswald's sack" and when asked about the person who took the photo (and when) failed to reply.

I find the notion that Oswald would construct a bag to transport the rifle, find that in order for the rifle to fit disassembled it, then simply leave the open end unsealed during transport, laughable.

[Richard Smith]

The conclusions are not “ad hoc" and founded on analysis of the under oath testimonies of those present. Your inability to rebut the testimonies is duly noted. JohnM reposted the image with the title “Oswald's sack" and when asked about the person who took the photo (and when) failed to reply.

I find the notion that Oswald would construct a bag to transport the rifle, find that in order for the rifle to fit disassembled it, then simply leave the open end unsealed during transport, laughable.

But you believe the DPD constructed the bag to carry the rifle, then didn't use the bag for that purpose, somehow confused it for the bag Oswald carried to work, never cleared that up and then lied about finding it in the SN?  And how do Oswald's prints get on it.  By comparison, I don't see anything implausible in a narrative where Oswald constructs a bag, puts his rifle in it, and understandably leaves it open on one end to place the rifle in it and then remove it.  That seems pretty straightforward by comparison.

[John Iacoletti]

But you believe the DPD constructed the bag to carry the rifle, then didn't use the bag for that purpose, somehow confused it for the bag Oswald carried to work, never cleared that up and then lied about finding it in the SN?  And how do Oswald's prints get on it.  By comparison, I don't see anything implausible in a narrative where Oswald constructs a bag, puts his rifle in it, and understandably leaves it open on one end to place the rifle in it and then remove it.  That seems pretty straightforward by comparison.

Anybody can make up a narrative and call it plausible.  I don't see anything implausible in police misrepresenting or tampering with evidence.  It happens all the time.