Historian explains the mind of Conspiracy Nuts - CBS 1967

[John Iacoletti]

JFK lurched backwards because every neuron in his brain fired off, causing the muscles in his legs to contract and his spine to bend violently and throw him backwards,

LOL. You really believe that “neuromuscular reaction” crap?

[Walt Cakebread]

LOL. You really believe that “neuromuscular reaction” crap?

Some folks will believe ANYTHING.....    Maybe they believe that JFK was electrocuted.

[Thomas Graves]

So..there was a possibility that it was an exiting bullet but does this not include the same possibility that it was an entry bullet?
There were histoical conspiracies to execute a political, military or cultural leader ---
Julius Ceaser....Jesus Christ...Adolf Hitler...Abraham Lincoln
There have been conspiracies to revolt against the power of rulers.
There was a 9/11 conspiracy initiated by zealots who believed there was/is a world wide conspiracy against them.....Conspiracy nuts

Jerr-wee, Jerr-wee, Jerr-wee,

<sigh>

I'm sure that evil, evil, evil Alan Dulles and evil, evil, evil James Angleton and evil, evil, evil [fill in the blank] hated JFK so doggone much that they were willing to risk being fried to death in "Old Sparky".

NOT!

--  MWT 

[Mike Orr]

Is this the same Historian who told Mr. ' Reclaiming History ' Vince Bugliosi , that his 1600 page plus , fiction , was the whole truth and nothing but the truth , so help me ..........? Vince tried to make it 26 volumes , BUT .......

[Pat Speer]

One of the great frustrations about this case is the SLOW SLOW pace at which un-contestable facts seep in.

Here's an un-contestable fact from 2014. Michael Kurtz is not to be relied upon. He repeatedly changed stories about his own connection to the case, and ultimately cited a bunch of interviews with people who were dead at the time. This is demonstrated here:
http://www.patspeer.com/chapter-19c-lost-in-the-jungle-with-kurtz

And here's one from 2009. Vincent Bugliosi wasn't much better. He spent a large chunk of his book claiming he wouldn't deceive his audience, and would root his book in the historical record, and then presented a narrative grossly at odds with the statements of the witnesses cited in his footnotes. This is demonstrated here:
http://www.patspeer.com/chapter9b%3Areclaiminghistoryfromreclaimin2

[Walt Cakebread]

One of the great frustrations about this case is the SLOW SLOW pace at which un-contestable facts seep in.

Here's an un-contestable fact from 2014. Michael Kurtz is not to be relied upon. He repeatedly changed stories about his own connection to the case, and ultimately cited a bunch of interviews with people who were dead at the time. This is demonstrated here:
http://www.patspeer.com/chapter-19c-lost-in-the-jungle-with-kurtz

And here's one from 2009. Vincent Bugliosi wasn't much better. He spent a large chunk of his book claiming he wouldn't deceive his audience, and would root his book in the historical record, and then presented a narrative grossly at odds with the statements of the witnesses cited in his footnotes. This is demonstrated here:
http://www.patspeer.com/chapter9b%3Areclaiminghistoryfromreclaimin2

Bugliosi's " Book for the ages"....has become the joke of the ages.

[Jerry Freeman]

                        the mind of  Conspiracy Nuts
A little side issue....What about Jeffery Epstein's "suicide" or was homicide just another wild nutty conspiracy theory?
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/08/jeffrey-epstein-dies-by-suicide-report.html