Who returned LHOs library books on Oct 3rd 1963?

[Charles Collins]

No evidence has been cited in this thread other than the Mosk memo and some conjecture and personal anecdotes.

Your contrarian attitude has you blinded.

[John Iacoletti]

Your contrarian attitude has you blinded.

"Contrarian" is a bogus label meant to try to absolve oneself from having a burden of proof for his claims.

"You just just accept my 'common sense' argument as 'evidence' or else you're being a 'contrarian'"

Yes I am.  Your argument is contrary to the actual facts and evidence.

[Charles Collins]

"Contrarian" is a bogus label meant to try to absolve oneself from having a burden of proof for his claims.

"You just just accept my 'common sense' argument as 'evidence' or else you're being a 'contrarian'"

Yes I am.  Your argument is contrary to the actual facts and evidence.

"Contrarian" is a bogus label meant to try to absolve oneself from having a burden of proof for his claims.

That might be your definition. But the actual fact of the matter is:

A contrarian is someone who takes an opposing view, especially for the sake of being difficult, contentious or in opposition to the generally held view.

Your blindness and wayward opinion has you lost out in left field somewhere.

[John Iacoletti]

A contrarian is someone who takes an opposing view, especially for the sake of being difficult, contentious or in opposition to the generally held view.

Well then that would be another unfounded assumption made by you, because you're under the impression that your opinions automatically constitute the "generally held view".  And/or that if a view is "generally held", that makes it automatically true.

[John Tonkovich]

Since I am an "old" , and do remember checking out books in the late 1960s, I can testify that records were kept of overdue books, since there were fines assessed for tardiness. (5 cents a day, perhaps?)

The Commission document notes a Dallas library delinquency on Oswald's part.

No mention of New Orleans' delinquencies, nor mention of any investigation therein.

Any objections to the above statements?

[Charles Collins]

Well then that would be another unfounded assumption made by you, because you're under the impression that your opinions automatically constitute the "generally held view".  And/or that if a view is "generally held", that makes it automatically true.

You disagree with practically everyone here about whatever. You fit the definition to a tee.

[John Iacoletti]

You disagree with practically everyone here about whatever. You fit the definition to a tee.

Only people who make claims that they can't support with actual evidence.

You seem to have a problem being disagreed with.