Coup D'etat in 1963

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Coup D'etat in 1963  (Read 19513 times)

Offline Steve M. Galbraith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1874
Re: Coup D'etat in 1963
« Reply #28 on: December 20, 2019, 07:44:58 PM »
Bingo!
Not to Iacolletti. You have to prove to him that the Illuminati/Rothschild/Federal Reserve power brokers who really run the world didn't kill JFK. He won't accept evidence - any - of Oswald's guilt but will consider this absolute paranoid nonsense.

It is odd: the theory is that all of these powerful groups who run the country, if not the world, had to stop JFK because something or other. They run the world, they have control of the levers of power but JFK had to be stopped because...well, something or other. Vietnam, the gold standard, aliens, the MIC...something.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Coup D'etat in 1963
« Reply #29 on: December 21, 2019, 05:26:22 AM »
Not to Iacolletti. You have to prove to him that the Illuminati/Rothschild/Federal Reserve power brokers who really run the world didn't kill JFK. He won't accept evidence - any - of Oswald's guilt but will consider this absolute paranoid nonsense.

What the hell are you talking about? When did I ever say anything about considering anything about Illuminati/Rothschild/Federal Reserve?

And what “evidence of Oswald’s guilt” do you mean?
« Last Edit: December 21, 2019, 05:27:10 AM by John Iacoletti »

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: Coup D'etat in 1963
« Reply #30 on: December 21, 2019, 06:19:53 AM »
8
Not to Iacolletti. You have to prove to him that the Illuminati/Rothschild/Federal Reserve power brokers who really run the world didn't kill JFK. He won't accept evidence - any - of Oswald's guilt but will consider this absolute paranoid nonsense.

It is odd: the theory is that all of these powerful groups who run the country, if not the world, had to stop JFK because something or other. They run the world, they have control of the levers of power but JFK had to be stopped because...well, something or other. Vietnam, the gold standard, aliens, the MIC...something.

Steve M.,

Even though Oswald probably killed JFK all by him widdle self, what you've listed above is what the KGB wanted us to believe.

Ask yourself: Why did  (already distrusted by CIA due to what he'd said in Geneva in June, 1962) false-defector Yuri Nosenko volunteer to the CIA in January, 1964, the highly implausible information that the KGB had had nothing whatsoever to do with Marine Corps radar operator Oswald during the 2.5 years he lived in the USSR, if not to get the CIA to take him to the U.S. for further questioning, to serve as a "conversation starter" of sorts, and to get us wishful-thinking Americans on his side, or at least the ones in CIA and the FBI -- which turned out to be a brilliant strategy on the part of the KGB, especially since it had programmed Nosenko to not "break" under harsh CIA interrogation (which he very nearly did, btw).

Ask yourself, also, why did triple-agent Boris Orehkov (FBI's SHAMROCK) tell the FBI in 1966 that the KGB had undertaken a six-month investigation of the assassination right after it happened, which alleged investigation allegedly concluded that JFK was killed by a consortium of Southern Oilmen and the Minutemen, or some-such thing.

Hmm, ... or was it the Military Industrial intelligence Community Complex in general ?

--  MWT  ;)
« Last Edit: December 21, 2019, 06:50:04 AM by Thomas Graves »