CVSA and LHO

[John Iacoletti]

We're human beings not robots or AI. But there is an objective reality that we can struggle to find.

Of course there is. That doesn’t mean you’ve found it.

But to argue that all of this evidence pointing at Oswald is wrong - all of it planted or faked or worthless - is a useless exercise. One can make that claim against the evidence for any event. So where does that lead to?

Simply arguing over and over that there is “all this evidence pointing at Oswald” is itself a useless exercise.

A sort of nihilism. Why even come here and comment day after day after day, thousands of posts, all saying "No, no, no"?

Why come here and comment “Oswald did it” day after day and thousands of posts?

Brennan lied and Brewer lied and Mcdonald lied and the fingerprints are faked and the photos are faked or wrong and the handwriting is wrong. That leads to nowhere.

That’s also a strawman conglomeration that nobody has ever argued. Neither Brennan, Brewer, or McDonald saw anybody kill JFK, nor is there any photos showing who killed JFK, nor is there any fingerprints or handwriting that would show who killed JFK.

Look, if people want to devote much of their lives to defending Oswald then go for it. But don't pretend to be interested in trying, as best as we can, to determine who shot JFK.

You’re not trying to determine anything. You’re arguing a conclusion that was predetermined.

Because you're not interested in that; you have some sort of bizarre need to defend this miserable waif Oswald. Waif. That means abandoned: that's how I think Oswald saw his life and his world.

On the contrary. You’re determined to prosecute a guy you don’t like with weak, tainted, and circumstantial evidence merely because you don’t like him. That’s not how to determine what’s actually true.

[Jerry Freeman]

If it indicates Oswald killed JFK then he'll reject it. He rejects fingerprint evidence, handwriting evidence, photographic evidence. He rejects eyewitness accounts, circumstantial evidence and anything else.

WHAT 'fingerprint evidence'? This was been lied about from the very first day.
Henry Wade--- "We have his fingerprints on the rifle" That was a lie. Clue #1- Oswald = Patsy
Handwriting ---Does not prove Oswald shot Kennedy or anyone else.
Photographic evidence---A bit too much photographic...does not prove Oswald shot Kennedy or anyone else
Circumstantial evidence is just that...circumstantial