Fifty Six Years Later, and Still The Oswald Apologists Have No Conspiracy Proof
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Fifty Six Years Later, and Still The Oswald Apologists Have No Conspiracy Proof  (Read 15247 times)

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Fifty Six Years Later, and Still The Oswald Apologists Have No Conspiracy Proof
« Reply #7 on: December 02, 2019, 04:14:09 AM »
What would it take to actually prove that there was a conspiracy anyway? ....especially after 56 years ::)
Logged

Offline Steve Barber

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 519
Re: Fifty Six Years Later, and Still The Oswald Apologists Have No Conspiracy Proof
« Reply #8 on: December 02, 2019, 05:03:47 AM »
Quote from: John Iacoletti on December 02, 2019, 01:37:32 AM
Great, let’s post a hundred threads then, all stating that you all haven’t been able to prove in the last 56 years that Oswald did it. Because, you know repetition is awesome.

  What's the difference?  You people have been posting  hundreds of posts of the same tripe for 56 years claiming there's a conspiracy, a second gunman, etc. without one shred of evidence that Oswald didn't do it!   "Repetition is awesome" works both ways.  It most definitely is not limited to those who believe Oswald is the lone assassin.  The conspiracy books contain the same thing. Rubbish.
« Last Edit: December 02, 2019, 05:04:25 AM by Steve Barber »
Logged

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Fifty Six Years Later, and Still The Oswald Apologists Have No Conspiracy Proof
« Reply #9 on: December 02, 2019, 05:47:23 AM »
Quote from: Steve Barber on December 02, 2019, 05:03:47 AM
  What's the difference?  You people have been posting  hundreds of posts of the same tripe for 56 years claiming there's a conspiracy, a second gunman, etc. without one shred of evidence that Oswald didn't do it!

Therefore Oswald did it by default? Is that how it works?
Logged

Offline Steve Barber

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 519
Re: Fifty Six Years Later, and Still The Oswald Apologists Have No Conspiracy Proof
« Reply #10 on: December 03, 2019, 02:30:01 PM »
Quote from: John Iacoletti on December 02, 2019, 05:47:23 AM
Therefore Oswald did it by default? Is that how it works?

Therefore, Oswald didn't do it by default (Oswald apologists).  Is that how it works?
Logged

Offline Joe Mannix

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 48
Re: Fifty Six Years Later, and Still The Oswald Apologists Have No Conspiracy Proof
« Reply #11 on: December 03, 2019, 03:42:56 PM »
Why did Jerry Ford move an entry wound location?
Logged

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Fifty Six Years Later, and Still The Oswald Apologists Have No Conspiracy Proof
« Reply #12 on: December 03, 2019, 07:09:52 PM »
Quote from: Joe Mannix on December 03, 2019, 03:42:56 PM
Why did Jerry Ford move an entry wound location?
He had to.
Logged

Online Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: Fifty Six Years Later, and Still The Oswald Apologists Have No Conspiracy Proof
« Reply #13 on: December 03, 2019, 07:37:37 PM »
Quote from: Steve Barber on December 03, 2019, 02:30:01 PM
Therefore, Oswald didn't do it by default (Oswald apologists).  Is that how it works?

The burden is with you LNers to prove Oswald's guilt; innocent until proven guilty, not the other way round. How's that worked out for you the last 56 years? The HSCA deemed this likely a conspiracy and Oswald was not a lone nut assassin, which implied the WCR was likely a cover up.

I thought a half century and releasing the JFK files should be enough to convict Oswald as a LN assassin, if he actually was one. Mooo, where's the beef?
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3
« previous next »