Is This Our Man?

[Thomas Graves]

Offputing or not, my approach achieves actual results. Unlike you, if I discerned my methods were unproductive, I would adjust my approach. You smear me much less creatively than Douglas Horne did, thank you for that. Another example of my research results, the discovery that WUBRINY-1 just happened to be, from Sept., 1944, one of sixteen housemates of Garrison "Garry" Coit, future CIA handler of Priscilla Johnson.:

Weeks ago, I asked Alan Ford to post examples of the actual "fruits" of his research pursuits....

One of sixteen, eh?

In Whitehorse, Yukon Territory in 1973 I ran into my grandparents from Indiana while I was hitchhiking from La Jolla to Homer, Alaska (destination Kodiak Island).

That counts for something, doesn't it?

But wait, it gets even more suspicious:

On the ferry boat from Homer to Kodiak I encountered a former (high school) classmate who had recently graduated from Stanford University, the very same school with which the Hoover Institute is affiliated!

The Hoover Institute!

Can you imagine?

At which at that very moment the never-uncovered-in-his-lifetime traitor Edward Ellis Smith (can you say "Popov's Mole"?) was working as a scholarly authority on ... gasp ... young Joe Stalin!

In regular contact with Ruskie scholars in that paradise known as the USSR !

Does that mean the gal on the ferry boat was Smith's "cut out," and I (or maybe my grandparents) was his handler?

Please don't tell anyone, Tom.

Do I have to beg?

--  MWT 

[Royell Storing]

Offputing or not, my approach achieves actual results. Unlike you, if I discerned my methods were unproductive, I would adjust my approach. You smear me much less creatively than Douglas Horne did, thank you for that. Another example of my research results, the discovery that WUBRINY-1 just happened to be, from Sept., 1944, one of sixteen housemates of Garrison "Garry" Coit, future CIA handler of Priscilla Johnson.:

Weeks ago, I asked Alan Ford to post examples of the actual "fruits" of his research pursuits....

     SCULLY - I appreciate the effort you put into all of your research. Your Now electing to go out of your way to run down Ford smacks of Jealousy. Though this is common in the JFK research community, try letting Your work speak for itself and put the knives away. Your current conduct does nothing but diminish a standing you have worked hard to achieve.

[Alan Ford]

     SCULLY - I appreciate the effort you put into all of your research. Your Now electing to go out of your way to run down Ford smacks of Jealousy. Though this is common in the JFK research community, try letting Your work speak for itself and put the knives away. Your current conduct does nothing but diminish a standing you have worked hard to achieve.

Reading through the old thread on Tan Jacket Man on the Education Forum was an instructive experience on two counts:
a) I learned lots about the Tan Jacket Man issue! 
b) I saw the comedy horror show that transpires when Mr Scully is given moderator powers on a research forum... Sadly, he hasn't changed since then------still the same ridiculous narcissism. On the bright side-------------he's not moderator of this forum! 

[Thomas Graves]

Reading through the old thread on Tan Jacket Man on the Education Forum was an instructive experience on two counts:
a) I learned lots about the Tan Jacket Man issue! 
b) I saw the comedy horror show that transpires when Mr Scully is given moderator powers on a research forum... Sadly, he hasn't changed since then------still the same ridiculous narcissism. On the bright side-------------he's not moderator of this forum! 

Alan,

Uhh, ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- why didn't you read that EF thread about Tan Jacket Man before you started posting about him here?

--  MWT   

[Alan Ford]

Alan,

Uhh, ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- why didn't you read that EF thread about Tan Jacket Man before you started posting about him here?

--  MWT   

Because I didn't know about it, Mr Graves-----------I only came across the Hughes gif while browsing through the 'Gerda Dunckel' section of Mr Unger's outstanding photographs gallery and it intrigued me!

Interesting things are happening on that Education Forum thread, but the discussion dies out due to the apparent IDing of 'Tan Jacket Man' on Houston St. in the Bronson film. Now that we know the man in Bronson was not 'Tan Jacket Man', ...

Now! You posit that Tan Jacket Man is clutching the handle of an umbrella, yes? If that is the case, why do we see none of his white-skinned hand/fingers?



 

[Thomas Graves]

Because I didn't know about it, Mr Graves-----------I only came across the Hughes gif while browsing through the 'Gerda Dunckel' section of Mr Unger's outstanding photographs gallery and it intrigued me!

Interesting things are happening on that Education Forum thread, but the discussion dies out due to the apparent IDing of 'Tan Jacket Man' on Houston St. in the Bronson film. Now that we know the man in Bronson was not 'Tan Jacket Man', ...

Now! You posit that Tan Jacket Man is clutching the handle of an umbrella, yes? If that is the case, why do we see none of his white-skinned hand/fingers?



 

Alan,


‐------------------------------------ You seem to be obsessed  with that particular frame !!!!!!!

Do you still think he has his hand in his pocket while he's turning ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

-------------------------------- If not, do you think he's holding something in that hand ? ? ? ? ? ? ?


--------------------------------- If so, what do you think it is ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

Now !!!!!!!

Friends ? ? ? ? ? ? ?


--  MWT 

Alan,

--------------------- No, I suspect it was the machinations of our very own Michael Clark, perpetrated on me and an unwitting (or witting?) Kathy B. that got me banned from James "Jumbo Duh" DiEugenio's de fecto [sic] forum.

Their loss, my gain.

--  MWT 

[Alan Ford]

Alan,


‐------------------------------------ You seem to be obsessed  with that particular frame !!!!!!!

Do you still think he has his hand in his pocket while he's turning ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

-------------------------------- If not, do you think he's holding something in that hand ? ? ? ? ? ? ?


--------------------------------- If so, what do you think it is ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

Now !!!!!!!

Friends ? ? ? ? ? ? ?


--  MWT 

Are you ok, Mr Graves? Is this the kind of manic behavior that got you banned from the Education Forum?

Now! That particular frame is important simply because it's the only frame after the man's turn in which we get an unobstructed view of his left arm 



I never believed he had his left hand in his pocket while turning, silly! 

Is he holding something in that left hand as he's turning? I don't know, that's what I'm trying to establish...



I think his left hand is in his (left!) pocket in the final frame (on the right here):



You--------------on the other hand--------------think he's holding an umbrella as he turns and is still holding (or "clutching") it by the handle in this final frame. This is clearly because you want him to be the man in Bell, who is carrying something.

But! You haven't explained the fact that we don't see any of his hand in this final frame:



Is this because you don't have an explanation?