Is This Our Man?

[Royell Storing]

No worries in one of your first posts you seemed to be sure the time was as long as 3 minutes, now due to the fact that the posted photo shatters your timeline your speculation shrinks to 2 minutes give or take, hilarious.

Really?

But on the other hand sarcasm goes right over your head.

JohnM

    Once again you simply misunderstood. No big deal if you want to take back that compliment. I would guess you are getting lambasted back stage. Someday, maybe you will have the courage to stand alone

[John Mytton]

    Once again you simply misunderstood. No big deal if you want to take back that compliment. I would guess you are getting lambasted back stage. Someday, maybe you will have the courage to stand alone

Once again you simply misunderstood.

There's two glaring errors right there, firstly I have never misunderstood, and secondly I fully understand your flexibility.

No big deal if you want to take back that compliment.

I said you were "a self proclaimed expert" and if you interpret that as a compliment then who am I to argue.

I would guess you are getting lambasted back stage.

That's a bad guess.

Someday, maybe you will have the courage to stand alone

JohnM

[Mark A. Oblazney]

There's two glaring errors right there, firstly I have never misunderstood, and secondly I fully understand your flexibility.

I said you were "a self proclaimed expert" and if you interpret that as a compliment then who am I to argue.

That's a bad guess.



JohnM

...... if he only had a brain.

[Alan Ford]

Friends, while the usual suspects are playing their favorite game of Let's Take This Thread Wildly Off-Topic, we might consider the question of whether Tan Jacket Man is holding anything in his left hand in the early Hughes frames:



If that's simply his shadow-darkened left hand we're seeing, then
----------------Tan Jacket Man is not the man shown walking across the south lawn in the Bell frames 

If that's not his left hand and he's holding some dark object in it, then
----------------it's either small enough to fit in his trousers pocket:



----------------or he's about to pass it off to the man in blue

 

[Thomas Graves]

Friends, while the usual suspects are playing their favorite game of Let's Take This Thread Wildly Off-Topic, we might consider the question of whether Tan Jacket Man is holding anything in his left hand in the early Hughes frames:



If that's simply his shadow-darkened left hand we're seeing, then
----------------Tan Jacket Man is not the man shown walking across the south lawn in the Bell frames 

If that's not his left hand and he's holding some dark object in it, then
----------------it's either small enough to fit in his trousers pocket:



----------------or he's about to pass it off to the man in blue

 

Or, as suggested by others at the EF back in the day, an umbrella handle.

--  MWT 

[Thomas Graves]

. . .

Tom,

Are you suggesting I should still be advocating for Tan Jacket Man's surreptitiously handing off something used in the assassination to another mysto man in the parking lot, although it now appears that the timing of his "military-like" turn was not premiditated, after all, but rather that they and other members of the crowd were being shooed away?

Was it Chris Davidson or Robin Unger who pointed out at the EF that the dark object in his left hand appeared to be curved, not unlike that of an umbrella handle?

Neither of them?  Somebody else?

Regardless, speaking of diversions, what could be more offputing than your interminable, impossible-to-read, seventeen-degrees-of-separation novellas?

--  MWT 

[Tom Scully]

Tom,

Are you suggesting I should still be advocating for Tan Jacket Man's surreptitiously handing off something used in the assassination to another man in the parking lot?

Was it Chris Davidson or Robin Unger who pointed out at the EF that the object in his left hand appeared to be curved, not unlike that of an umbrella handle?

Speaking of diversions, what could be more offputing than your interminable seventeen degrees-of-separation novellas?

--  MWT 

Offputing or not, my approach achieves actual results. Unlike you, if I discerned my methods were unproductive, I would adjust my approach. You smear me much less creatively than Douglas Horne did, thank you for that. Another example of my research results, the discovery that WUBRINY-1 just happened to be, from Sept., 1944, one of sixteen housemates of Garrison "Garry" Coit, future CIA handler of Priscilla Johnson.:

https://www.maryferrell.org/php/cryptdb.php?id=WUBRINY-1&search=devine%20and%20coit
1. WUBRINY-1
Found in: Cryptonym Database
and Coit’s surviving fraternity roommates from 1944 to 48 still find time to visit with Barbara Coit.
Coit enlisted in the Naval Radio Training Pro- gram.
Devine and…

Weeks ago, I asked Alan Ford to post examples of the actual "fruits" of his research pursuits....