Dallas Police Crime Lab

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Dallas Police Crime Lab  (Read 29545 times)

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: Dallas Police Crime Lab
« Reply #21 on: November 08, 2019, 01:16:06 PM »
Thanks Charles, the rifle had to touch Oswald's palm to leave a print and considering that Oswald wasn't accessible after a few days, the stupid conspiracy theory that the palmprint "magically" turned up a week later is only endorsed by the extremely desperate.

The FBI confirmed that Day's print had to have come from the rifle.



This high res image of Day's print shows the random points that were used in matching the rifle prints.



JohnM

Thanks John, yes the FBI had to have been satisfied with that evidence which indicates that the palm print came from the rifle. Otherwise, it seems to me that they would have been questioning the other officers who worked in the Crime Lab to see if they had seen the palm print.

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: Dallas Police Crime Lab
« Reply #22 on: November 08, 2019, 01:17:30 PM »
I made the mistake of replying to Walt and discovered just how dishonest he really is, it's best to keep away.

JohnM

I usually do.  Thumb1:

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Dallas Police Crime Lab
« Reply #23 on: November 08, 2019, 02:26:51 PM »
I usually do.  Thumb1:

It's not unusual for a person who is attempting to propagate a tale to avoid those who can easily expose the lies.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Dallas Police Crime Lab
« Reply #24 on: November 08, 2019, 02:36:15 PM »
Wow, "LOL" is such a witty response, I'm absolutely shattered.

Who cares if you’re shattered? LOL is the only response your baseless claims deserve.

Quote
No worries.



Your morph of two photos of the same lift proves exactly nothing about the rifle. Try again.

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5123
Re: Dallas Police Crime Lab
« Reply #25 on: November 08, 2019, 02:41:21 PM »

Your morph of two photos of the same lift proves exactly nothing about the rifle. Try again.

Wrong, the Day print is being directly compared to the FBI print, check it yourself, you lose. But i am happy that you thought its the same print.  Thumb1:
Btw you are really getting your ass kicked in this thread, but keep trying! LOL.

JohnM
« Last Edit: November 08, 2019, 03:03:03 PM by John Mytton »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Dallas Police Crime Lab
« Reply #26 on: November 08, 2019, 02:44:21 PM »
You're trying to hard Iacoletti, all of the above can be true, Day was still releasing evidence to Drain at 11:45 PM and it's possible that Day gathered the rifle and gave C2766 to Drain a little after midnight which means that Day was not lying when he said that he only told Fritz and Curry about the palm print on that night and then on the next day he told Drain about the rifle, and Livingston obviously heard what was being said to Drain, so everyone is clean, job done!

Now who’s being desperate?

Quote
Cite?

Also in CE3145:

"Lt. Day stated he made a written report on January 8, 1964, to Mr. G. L. Lumpkin. Deputy of Police, Service Division of the Dallas Police Department. This report is set forth as requested of Lt. Day, and a copy of such report was furnished for transmittal to the President's Commission investigating the assassination pf President Kennedy. Lt. Day stated he preferred to let the written report speak for itself and would rather elaborate orally on the lifting of the palm print from the underside of the rifle, which palm print was found when he examined the rifle on November 22, 1963, rather than to make a written signed statement."

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5123
Re: Dallas Police Crime Lab
« Reply #27 on: November 08, 2019, 02:50:53 PM »

Also in CE3145:

"Lt. Day stated he made a written report on January 8, 1964, to Mr. G. L. Lumpkin. Deputy of Police, Service Division of the Dallas Police Department. This report is set forth as requested of Lt. Day, and a copy of such report was furnished for transmittal to the President's Commission investigating the assassination pf President Kennedy. Lt. Day stated he preferred to let the written report speak for itself and would rather elaborate orally on the lifting of the palm print from the underside of the rifle, which palm print was found when he examined the rifle on November 22, 1963, rather than to make a written signed statement."

So what, Day wasnt trying to hide anything, its just another worthless accusation.

JohnM