3 x 5 Index Card that is item # 14 On the List

[John Iacoletti]

Thanks for the comparison, Gary!  Looks stained in the bottom photo.

[John Iacoletti]

Insults??....     I'm merely calling it as I see it....

You think that namecalling makes your evidence-less argument more convincing.  What else is new?  That's your M.O.

Since you can't see the paper sack is not darkened ....Then perhaps you can count....  How many spent shells did they have on Friday?   How many did they have on Tuesday 11-26 -63?    I believe you'l have to agree that on Tuesday 11-26-63  they had added a spent shell to make the total  in hand,... THREE ...but the photo shows only TWO spent shells, which is the number they had on Friday 11-22-63 .....

How do you know when the third spent shell was "added"?

By that logic, though, your evidence list could have been typed up anytime between 1//22 and 11/26, and the magic partial palmprint is still not in the 11/26 evidence photo.

[Walt Cakebread]

You think that namecalling makes your evidence-less argument more convincing.  What else is new?  That's your M.O.

How do you know when the third spent shell was "added"?

By that logic, though, your evidence list could have been typed up anytime between 1//22 and 11/26, and the magic partial palmprint is still not in the 11/26 evidence photo.

I've long suspected that your goal here is to run interference for the DPD......   The more you deny the so called palm print was among the evidence that was turned over to the FBI at midnight 11-22-63...the more I believe that you're just a contrarian troll.  Because no rational honest person could be as stupid as you present yourself ......

[John Iacoletti]

I’m “denying” it because there is no evidence whatsoever that this list was typed up on 11/22. All of your fabrications involve you stating things as facts that you completely made up with no supporting evidence. Have you convinced even a single person that this claim of yours is true?

[Walt Cakebread]

The photo that you posted (the one from 11/26) shows a bag that appears to be darkened from silver nitrate.  It continues to darken more over time.  Whatever prints may have been on there are long since obliterated.  Now do you have any actual evidence that this evidence list was typed up on 11/22 or not?  Insults are not evidence.

The "darkening" of the paper sack is merely shadow....  The same darkening can be seen on the shirt in the photo.

[Gary Craig]

The "darkening" of the paper sack is merely shadow....  The same darkening can be seen on the shirt in the photo.

"The "darkening" of the paper sack is merely shadow"

The view of the evidence below shows it's all sitting on one large sheet of "unadulterated" wrapping paper.

That's it's natural color/shade.

[Walt Cakebread]

"The "darkening" of the paper sack is merely shadow"

The view of the evidence below shows it's all sitting on one large sheet of "unadulterated" wrapping paper.

That's it's natural color/shade.

Are you not aware that there are different shades of brown wrapping paper?    It varies from manufacturer to manufacturer.....