3 x 5 Index Card that is item # 14 On the List

[John Iacoletti]

So you acknowledge that they photographed the evidence on 11-26-63 but deny that they photographed the evidence on 11-22-63....in spite of the fact that they would have been impossible to photograph the paper bag in the undamaged condition on 11-26-63, because the FBI destroyed the paper bag in testing on 11-23-63.

How do you know that the bag in the 11/26 photo hasn't already been processed with silver nitrate?  It looks darkened to me.

[John Iacoletti]

The FACT remains....Item number 14 on the original list that was typed up on 11-22-63 is:......1 Partial Palm print "off underside gun barrel near end of foregrip " on rifle C2766

The fact remains that you have no evidence that this list was typed up on 11-22-63.

[Thomas Graves]

The fact remains that you have no evidence that this list was typed up on 11-22-63.

Iacoletti,

In your humble opinion, what would constitute "evidence" here (hypothetically speaking, of course)?

A film showing the list being made ... with a wall calendar in the background?

LOL

[Walt Cakebread]

How do you know that the bag in the 11/26 photo hasn't already been processed with silver nitrate?  It looks darkened to me.

Read the FBI report.....The FBI testified that the paper turned very dark brown....and there are photos of the bag that show it after the testing....They protected a small area of the bag to preserve the original color, and the contrast between the darkened paper and the original is very clear.

But I understand your reluctance to extract your head......

[John Iacoletti]

Read the FBI report.....The FBI testified that the paper turned very dark brown....and there are photos of the bag that show it after the testing....They protected a small area of the bag to preserve the original color, and the contrast between the darkened paper and the original is very clear.

But I understand your reluctance to extract your head......

The photo that you posted (the one from 11/26) shows a bag that appears to be darkened from silver nitrate.  It continues to darken more over time.  Whatever prints may have been on there are long since obliterated.  Now do you have any actual evidence that this evidence list was typed up on 11/22 or not?  Insults are not evidence.

[Gary Craig]

[Walt Cakebread]

The photo that you posted (the one from 11/26) shows a bag that appears to be darkened from silver nitrate.  It continues to darken morew over time.  Whatever prints may have been on there are long since obliterated.  Now do you have any actual evidence that this evidence list was typed up on 11/22 or not?  Insults are not evidence.

Insults??....     I'm merely calling it as I see it....   

Since you can't see the paper sack is not darkened ....Then perhaps you can count....  How many spent shells did they have on Friday?   How many did they have on Tuesday 11-26 -63?    I believe you'l have to agree that on Tuesday 11-26-63  they had added a spent shell to make the total  in hand,... THREE ...but the photo shows only TWO spent shells, which is the number they had on Friday 11-22-63 .....