3 x 5 Index Card that is item # 14 On the List

[Walt Cakebread]

No Walt. You said that evidence sheet couldn’t be found in the WC exhibits because they didn’t want people to know about the palmprint. And I pointed out that the list in the WC exhibits also mentions the palmprint. Why would they keep that on the list if they altered it to hide the existence of the palmprint. That’s why I said that this fabrication doesn’t even make sense.

There’s still ZERO evidence that this list was created on 11/22 or accompanied the FBI transfer that night.

ZERO.

I pointed out that the list in the WC exhibits also mentions the palmprint. Why would they keep that on the list if they altered it to hide the existence of the palmprint

JEEEEZ...I really didn't think that you were this thick....   They wanted it on the altered list, because that altered list was created AFTER the FBI returned the evidence to Dallas...and that was AFTER Day ( with help ) had invented the tale (damned lie) about finding the print but had failed to tell the FBI on 11 /22/63.

[Walt Cakebread]

Maybe because of the “spent rounds (2)” but not because of the palmprint card that appears on both lists. That’s what you keep trying to sell.

No!,  that's NOT the major point... The main point is: There was an evidence list created for the evidence that was released to FBI  Vince Drain at midnight 11 / 22/ 63.

However....That 3 X5 card was listed on that original list.   Both the FBI and the DPD denied that Day had revealed that he had found a palm print on the gun.  But by the 26th they decided that they would use that 3 X 5 card as proof that Lee Oswald's palm print was on that rifle,   Forgetting that the card was listed on the original list of 11 / 22/63.     When they realized the FU  they tried to destroy all of the original list...But a Texas Ranger had filed one away . and J.Gary Shaw uncovered it several years later.  That Original evidence list is NOT one of the WC exhibits.

[John Iacoletti]

I pointed out that the list in the WC exhibits also mentions the palmprint. Why would they keep that on the list if they altered it to hide the existence of the palmprint

JEEEEZ...I really didn't think that you were this thick....   They wanted it on the altered list, because that altered list was created AFTER the FBI returned the evidence to Dallas...and that was AFTER Day ( with help ) had invented the tale (damned lie) about finding the print but had failed to tell the FBI on 11 /22/63.

Since neither list is dated, what the hell difference does it make?

[Walt Cakebread]

Since neither list is dated, what the hell difference does it make?

When are you going to wake up and see the light?     I don't see how I can make it any clearer....    The lists do not have to be dated to know the dates on which they were created.....  The information on the lists themselves indicate when they were created.   

[John Iacoletti]

When are you going to wake up and see the light?

When you come up with some evidence beyond a fanciful story and “common sense”.

Hell, a story that even makes sense would be a good start.

[Walt Cakebread]

When you come up with some evidence beyond a fanciful story and “common sense”.

Hell, a story that even makes sense would be a good start.

The reason that you can't comprehend is because you accept the crap the WC created in questioning Latona.    The WC was NOT a fact finding committee... It was a cover up committee.

As the old axiom says... You can lead a jackass to water but you can't make him drink. 

You have taken one tiny step in acknowledging that the original list was created for the evidence that was being released to FBI agent Drain at midnight 11 /22/63.

You never did produce the original list ( not the altered list)  that you said was a Warren Commission exhibit.   When are you going to do that?

[Walt Cakebread]

Since neither list is dated, what the hell difference does it make?

I don’t lie. The “spent rounds (3)” version of the list is in CE 2003 (p 130). It says exactly the same thing about the partial palm print as the “spent rounds (2)” version.

Quote

The 3 X 5 card is on both lists ....but when the list was created on 11 /22/63 there was no identifiable print on that cellophane tape....but when it was released to the FBI on 11/26/ 63 it had the palm print of Lee Oswald on the cellophane tape....

This fabrication gets more and more absurd every minute. They hid the original list because they didn’t want us to know about the palmprint, so they replaced it with an altered copy that says the exact same thing about the palmprint. Makes perfect sense.
« Last Edit: October 26, 2019, 11:09:02 PM by John Iacoletti »


They hid the original list because they didn’t want us to know about the palmprint,  HAD BEEN SENT TO THE FBI ON 11 /22 /63 .   They wanted to pretend that detective Day and the DPD had not sent the 3 X 5 card with the evidence that was sent at midnight 11 /22 / 63.  They  said that Day had neglected to tell the FBI about his discovery when they released the evidence at midnight 11 /22 /63.   But the list has the 3 X 5 card listed as item #14.  So both the DPD and the FBI lied when the said that Day neglected to inform the FBI about the "palm Print"

Now let's change gears and examine that story.....  Day said that he found a print on the bottom of (the 5/8 inch diameter) metal barrel near the end of the foregrip.

First off...  Once the stock is removed there is no foregrip on the metal barrel.

Second)    CE 1304 on page 132 of the Warren Report  is a photo of the disassembled carcano.   That photo clearly shows that DAY  COULD NOT have found a print on the metal barrel at the location he described because the bayonet lug surrounds the barrel at that location on the barrel.   IOW Day's claim is impossible.

Third ) Day said that he saw a print on the metal barrel that was sticking out from beneath the wood of the stock about 3 inches back from the muzzle end of the rifle   
He said he could see the print on the SIDE of the barrel.  So he disassembled the rifle and found a print on the BOTTOM of the barrel.  LOOK at the photo of the disassembled carcano ( CE 1304 p 132 WR) ans see with your own eyes the bayonet lug that surrounds the barrel rendering Day's tale a damned lie.