Nitpicky Question About The Bag

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Nitpicky Question About The Bag  (Read 33293 times)

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Nitpicky Question About The Bag
« Reply #28 on: September 29, 2019, 11:20:29 PM »
The rough wood of the stock wouldn't "take" a print very well, and he could have wiped down the metal parts with his other shirt before putting it back on.

Anyway, a palm print of his was found on the rifle.

http://22november1963.org.uk/oswald-fingerprintpalmprint-evidence

--  MWT  ;)

The rough wood of the stock wouldn't "take" a print very well,

This is a false statement that is rarely challenged.... The wood of stock of C2766 was NOT "rough ".....It's true that the wood was not highly polished, but it was not "rough".  There are many photos of the rifle and it's obvious that the wood isn't rough.
« Last Edit: September 30, 2019, 12:48:25 AM by Walt Cakebread »

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Nitpicky Question About The Bag
« Reply #29 on: September 30, 2019, 12:08:03 AM »
Anyway, a palm print of his was found on the rifle....

http://22november1963.org.uk/oswald-fingerprintpalmprint-evidence
I thought this thread was about the 'bag'. Tommy wanders off again. The link doesn't work BTW...and it wasn't an official link anyway. Try it again 8) 

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Nitpicky Question About The Bag
« Reply #30 on: September 30, 2019, 01:07:47 AM »
The rough wood of the stock wouldn't "take" a print very well, and he could have wiped down the metal parts with his other shirt before putting it back on.

Anyway, a palm print of his was found on the rifle.

http://22november1963.org.uk/oswald-fingerprintpalmprint-evidence

--  MWT  ;)

Makes sense that rifles and hand guns would have roughened surfaces, in order to grip more solidly.
« Last Edit: September 30, 2019, 01:08:54 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Nitpicky Question About The Bag
« Reply #31 on: September 30, 2019, 01:20:56 AM »
Makes sense that rifles and hand guns would have roughened surfaces, in order to grip more solidly.


I know without any doubt and from personal experience , that the wood of the military carcano is no more rough than the heavy brown paper, and cardboard that the police and FBI said they found prints on.   IMO the wooden stock of the carcano is actually smoother than the brown paper. 

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Nitpicky Question About The Bag
« Reply #32 on: September 30, 2019, 04:45:14 AM »
I know without any doubt and from personal experience..... 
But that is overruled by advanced conjecture, expert guesswork and professional speculation.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Nitpicky Question About The Bag
« Reply #33 on: September 30, 2019, 12:34:34 PM »

I know without any doubt and from personal experience , that the wood of the military carcano is no more rough than the heavy brown paper, and cardboard that the police and FBI said they found prints on.   IMO the wooden stock of the carcano is actually smoother than the brown paper.

Which Carcano? Yours?

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Nitpicky Question About The Bag
« Reply #34 on: September 30, 2019, 01:18:55 PM »
Which Carcano? Yours?

I own several....And I've seen hundreds....