Those Front Steps

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Those Front Steps  (Read 348717 times)

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #1029 on: December 22, 2019, 04:00:04 AM »
Geez, what can I say, I'm busted! :o

I was having a closer look at the people in the "fraction of a second" Lovelady GIF, and they all seem to have at least a slight reaction, the man next to the entrance wall seems to lean back, the lady in black's head similarly seems to lean back, the person in the front with their hand shielding their eyes seems to slightly lower their hand to cover their eyes and Lovelady of course is ducking down. Lovelady's testimony says that he heard the "fireworks" and didn't realize that there was any weapon till later.



Mark Tyler made a GIF showing the P.Parade and when the pictures/films were taken, the graphic's timeline is based on a constant speed of the vehicles and compared to what can can be seen in Zapruder and the films/photographs, so there will be some expected discrepancies of a second or two but it looks to be pretty close. Anyway Mark has the start of Wiegman about half a second before the head shot and allowing for the above expected error tolerances, the above 4 reactions may have been to the sound of the head shot that resulted in Z313?



JohnM

Nice find. I wonder how much of those movements have to do with the movement of the camera.

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #1030 on: December 22, 2019, 04:42:29 AM »
John,

Are you still working for the CIA? DiEugenio was on to you. You can't get anything past that guy.  :D

Nickerson,

Are you and "Jumbo Duh" still working for the humanitarian organization formerly known as "the KGB"?

--  MWT  ;)

PS  Thanks for posting the Wiegman frame showing glasses-wearing Mrs. Robert Reid I mean Jack Ruby's sister in the yellow circle!
« Last Edit: December 22, 2019, 04:50:06 AM by Thomas Graves »

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #1031 on: December 22, 2019, 05:48:32 AM »
Hi Steve and Tim, thanks,

 :D :D :D

Any other Nutters want to congratulate Mr Mytton on his Important Double Discovery that a) there are not two people but only one person inside this circle-------------



-------------and b) Mr Lovelady is at this instant------------



---------------way back on the doorway landing about to tie his shoelaces in reaction to the sound of gunfire?

Quote
the motion blur graphic that refuted the silly "two heads theory" relied on the fact that Lovelady's head was moving down independently from everyone else and here's the proof.


 :D

Mr Mytton, can you build on your triumphant merging of 2 people into one-------------



----------------by kindly sharing with us the numbers of the two frames you used from this sequence--------------



----------------to come up with this?



Thank you!  Thumb1:

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #1032 on: December 22, 2019, 05:52:26 AM »
Geez, what can I say, I'm busted! :o

I was having a closer look at the people in the "fraction of a second" Lovelady GIF, and they all seem to have at least a slight reaction, the man next to the entrance wall seems to lean back, the lady in black's head similarly seems to lean back, the person in the front with their hand shielding their eyes seems to slightly lower their hand to cover their eyes and Lovelady of course is ducking down.

And my, that's rather more than "a slight reaction" from the women down on the street...



Unless of course these frames aren't consecutive like you were hoping folks would believe!

 :D :D :D
« Last Edit: December 22, 2019, 06:35:27 AM by Alan Ford »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5015
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #1033 on: December 22, 2019, 03:58:35 PM »
Nice find. I wonder how much of those movements have to do with the movement of the camera.

   For starters, the Tyler GIF is erroneous. There is No Way the LBJ SS Follow-Up Car was that close to the LBJ Convertible when they were almost to the Stemmons sign. If you look at the fuzzy last couple frames of the Bronson Film, (usually cut), you can see roughly 6 feet behind LBJ's Convertible. The LBJ SS Follow-Up car is Not in sight and this image is well before reaching the Stemmons Sign. Also, I believe the spacing between the Camera Cars and the 2 Press Buses is Wrong. Take a look at the Darnell footage showing the 2 Press Buses on Houston. The 1st 2 camera cars are already traveling down Elm St after having made the turn off of Houston. This is why I continue to say the Time Stamping of JFK Assassination Images is Wrong. The Tyler GIF makes the Motorcade look like pretty maids all in a row. There were Gaps in the Motorcade due to the STOPPING OF autos in the Motorcade. This is also why we see the Martin assassination film showing the LBJ Convertible emerging from the Triple Underpass with absolutely No Other vehicles trailing anywhere behind it. There were GAPS in the motorcade = Time Passing. 
« Last Edit: December 22, 2019, 04:15:49 PM by Royell Storing »

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #1034 on: December 27, 2019, 02:55:59 PM »
----------------by kindly sharing with us the numbers of the two frames you used from this sequence--------------



----------------to come up with this?



Thank you!  Thumb1:

Bumped for Mr Mytton---------------who is showing himself surprisingly slow to disabuse us all of the suspicion that his latest GIF (true to Myttonesque form) had the sole purpose of misleading usThumb1:

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #1035 on: December 27, 2019, 03:02:31 PM »
Now!

This problem is not going to go away, folks. The dark vertical strip down Mr Lovelady in all the frames in which he appears in the Wiegman film------------------



-------------------is a fake shadow which has been added by aerial imaging in order to hide something.

I have offered a logical explanation as to why this fake shadow was added (in order to hide the face of Mr Lee Harvey Oswald). I have yet to hear a single logical alternative suggestion.

Tickety-tock!  Thumb1: