Why the first shot missed

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Why the first shot missed  (Read 138695 times)

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: Why the first shot missed
« Reply #91 on: July 12, 2019, 01:50:25 PM »
 

There is some "grain noise" altering the registration on the film. That is normal for 8-mm film. What's happening in the SN window is significantly more than that.

I agree with John M. that there is movement in the open area of the SN window.

Seems primarily over the boxes by the window sill rather than between the boxes and the east-side window frame.

This particular Hughes sequence, per Myers, stops 13.16 sec before the head shot. About 3.3 sec before Z133 or 4.6 sec before Z157.



Yes, it is close enough to the point in time that the sniper would be tracking the limo and getting ready to fire.

Offline Duncan MacRae

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 582
    • JFK Assassination Photographs
Re: Why the first shot missed
« Reply #92 on: July 12, 2019, 01:56:06 PM »
Four frames extracted from John's Gif, cropped and given a slight contrast adjustment.

The two frames, which appear to show a figure with a Rifle, have red letters marked over them.



One single frame which appears to show the figure with a Rifle.


Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: Why the first shot missed
« Reply #93 on: July 12, 2019, 02:08:12 PM »
Four frames extracted from John's Gif, cropped and given a slight contrast adjustment.

The two frames, which appear to show a figure with a Rifle, have red letters marked over them.



One single frame which appears to show the figure with a Rifle.



Thanks, Duncan.

I wish (John's?) red letters weren't there to obscure what we're looking at.

-- MWT   ::)

Offline Duncan MacRae

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 582
    • JFK Assassination Photographs
Re: Why the first shot missed
« Reply #94 on: July 12, 2019, 02:21:50 PM »
Thanks, Duncan.

I wish (John's?) red letters weren't there to obscure what we're looking at.

-- MWT   ::)

The red markings are on the "The Lost Bullet" enhanced film.

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: Why the first shot missed
« Reply #95 on: July 12, 2019, 02:39:58 PM »
Charles,

Please explain (or rephrase) how you've shown that the "sitting box" was much closer to the window than Holland believes it was.

Thanks.

-- MWT  ;)

Edit:  nm

I understand, now.

Question:  Do you believe Holland's analysis of how the cartridge casings ended up where the did is valid?

Do you believe Holland's analysis of how the cartridge casings ended up where the did is valid?

I believe that Holland showed one possibility, that is reasonable. However, I wish they had also tested using the similar rifle angle that would have occurred, with the rifle aimed at the limo position at that point in time, from the lower sitting position on the box. If the shot did miss due to box interference, I imagine that the sniper would have been a little frustrated. And that when he pulled the bolt back to reload, he might have used more force than normal due to that frustration. Which might have caused the shell to travel further than it would have otherwise.

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: Why the first shot missed
« Reply #96 on: July 12, 2019, 02:41:52 PM »
Four frames extracted from John's Gif, cropped and given a slight contrast adjustment.

The two frames, which appear to show a figure with a Rifle, have red letters marked over them.



One single frame which appears to show the figure with a Rifle.



Wow!

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: Why the first shot missed
« Reply #97 on: July 12, 2019, 03:04:42 PM »
Wow!

Just wondering ...

Did Thierry "Fake News" Speth have anything to do with the creation of the "enhanced" images on the DVD?

-- MWT  ;)

« Last Edit: July 12, 2019, 03:10:34 PM by Thomas Graves »