POLL. Is John Iacoletti right to separate the coupon from the envelope in CE773?

[Jerry Freeman]

You're joking, right? 

  Serial numbers can be scratched off of weapons ...odd that it wasn't if it was destined to be a murder weapon -starting with the alleged Walker shooting--  Same with pistols. Oh, that's against the law? Give me a break and don't mention that.
Either Oswald left a hundred and umpteen points of 'evidence' behind to play 'catch me if you can' or he got set up.
Well, he got set up.
 

[Bill Chapman]

Mr. Freeman: Lee was set up
Mr. Oswald: Okay, sure

[Jerry Freeman]

Mr. Freeman: Lee was set up
Mr. Oswald: Okay, sure 

As usual...a non-contribution.

[Zeon Mason]

imo, the conspirators would make use of their expert handwriting forger to write on both envelope and coupon at same table in Fritz office, where the paper bag was placed and Oswald's palm print placed on it while Oswald was in handcuffs and they could force him to touch the paper with one his hands.

[Bill Chapman]

As usual...a non-contribution.

As usual... removing part of my post

Sane people everywhere roll their eyes at you lot

[Jerry Freeman]

As usual... removing part of my post

As usual...whining about trivial stuff.

Sane people everywhere roll their eyes at you lot

SANE people? Then why would you?

[Richard Smith]

You're joking, right? The President was just killed so they immediately traced the rifle which led to Kleins and the Kliens microfilm led to Hidell's PO Box which was owned by Oswald, Oswald worked in the Depository building and Oswald was also seen killing Tippit, see how this works, detective work is one logical deduction one after another.
All the evidence leads to Oswald.

JohnM

These are just the same lazy contrarians attempting to frame the evidence in the context of an impossible standard of proof to create false doubt.  If all of this evidence doesn't satisfy them that Oswald ordered the rifle, then what could?  Nothing.  It's difficult to conceive how there could be any more evidence of the matter than exists under the circumstances.  It's a minor miracle that so much evidence does exist.  This is just more pointless defense attorney nonsense to defend a guilty client.  Suggest false doubt about everything.  Make no attempt whatsoever to explain the consequences of this false doubt having any validity.  As you asked to begin with, how and why would the coupon and the envelope be photographed together if they were not related?