Indisputable Evidence for Harvey & Lee

[Sandy Larsen]

Just talked with a Prof of Orthodontics. I just related the basic details of a missing premolar and the relevant ages of the individual no mention of who it was. His answer was emphatic....there is no way that the teeth will restraighten once tipped without application of some device to correct it.

Colin,

Thanks for checking that out with an expert. It only makes sense that teeth don't straighten back up after tipping, as there is no force present to push the teeth back up. In contrast, the opposing teeth -- the top ones in this case -- continue to apply force down on he tipped teeth.

[Colin Crow]

Colin,

Thanks for checking that out with an expert. It only makes sense that teeth don't straighten back up after tipping, as there is no force present to push the teeth back up. In contrast, the opposing teeth -- the top ones in this case -- continue to apply force down on he tipped teeth.

Apparently it is also force from the teeth "behind" that cause the tipping. Due to imbalance of loss of opposing force "in front".

Happy to assist Sandy.

[Sandy Larsen]

Quote from: John Anderson on Today at 04:20:22 PM

    You must admit Bill, the whole Harvey and Lee thing is just too much.

I absolutely agree, John.

Bill,

Here's a very simple question for you:

How do you explain that, according to his 1958 dental record, Oswald had a prosthesis (false tooth). But the exhumed Oswald had all natural teeth and no room for a prosthesis?

[Sandy Larsen]

How should I put this, oh, THERE WERE NO TWO OSWALD'S. The two Oswald theory is absolute hogwash. Amazing that people are sucked in by this nonsense.

Paul,

Here's a very simple question for you:

How do you explain that, according to his 1958 dental record, Oswald had a prosthesis (false tooth). But the exhumed Oswald had all natural teeth and no room for a prosthesis?

[Sandy Larsen]

Do you have any photos of "LEE"?

JohnM

Here's one that shows that LEE did smile showing his teeth. (LEE's on the left.)  (Which kinda blows your theory.) In fact, this one looks a lot like the one of him showing the lost tooth when he was younger:

[John Mytton]

Here's one that shows that LEE did smile showing his teeth. (LEE's on the left.)  (Which kinda blows your theory.) In fact, this one looks a lot like the one of him showing the lost tooth when he was younger:

Here's one that shows that LEE did smile showing his teeth. (LEE's on the left.)

Here's your HARVEY directly compared to LEE and they are the SAME person.
The ratio of eyes to cheekbones to facial muscles to ears to nose to lips to chin are totally consistent.
The ears considered to be like fingerprints are both exactly the same with the same position, shape and folds.

(Which kinda blows your theory.)

Ummm, what theory?

In fact, this one looks a lot like the one of him showing the lost tooth when he was younger:

Of course, they are the same person.

There is no missing teeth, in the following gif of the same person you're just seeing inside Oswald's mouth.




Btw every photo you've posted of Harvey and LEE are all the same person, Lee Harvey Oswald.



JohnM

[Bill Brown]

Bill,

Here's a very simple question for you:

How do you explain that, according to his 1958 dental record, Oswald had a prosthesis (false tooth). But the exhumed Oswald had all natural teeth and no room for a prosthesis?

Hi Sandy.

First, can you explain to me how a dental report from March of 1958 can possibly list May 5th, 1958 as the date that a prosthesis failed?  Am I missing something?

From your original post (below)....

In the chart for Oswald's dental exam dated March 27, 1958, is a field where the questions is asked, "Prosthetic Required?"

The dentist is instructed to "explain briefly" if the answer is yes. And that is precisely what Oswald's

dentist did. He wrote "FAILED 5-5-58." In other words, Oswald required a prosthesis because the one he

currently had failed on May 5, 1958.