Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?  (Read 340888 times)

Offline Michael Capasse

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1006
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #644 on: Today at 02:00:17 AM »
I watched it when if first played on American TV, hosted by Geraldo Rivera. It played over several nights if I remember right and I'm not sure I caught all of it, but what I saw was very good. I'll check out the YouTube video.

It was the cable channel Showtime. Over 2 nights.
Hosted by Edwin Newman. I watched it.

https://time.com/archive/6707829/video-what-if-oswald-had-stood-trial/
« Last Edit: Today at 02:09:24 AM by Michael Capasse »

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2548
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #645 on: Today at 04:52:36 AM »
It was the cable channel Showtime. Over 2 nights.
Hosted by Edwin Newman. I watched it.

https://time.com/archive/6707829/video-what-if-oswald-had-stood-trial/

There was a different showing hosted by Geraldo Rivera. I can't remember which channel it was on but I want to guess The History Channel. The Trial was conducted by the BBC. American cable companies showed it on their channels with the host of their choice. At the end of the televised trial, Geraldo interviewed both Bugliosi and Spence together. My guess is the interview was conducted well after the trial concluded but it was made to appear Geraldo was interviewing the adversaries right after the verdict was read.

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5235
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #646 on: Today at 06:40:12 AM »
LOL! This is just hilarious. This confirms my theory that you are stuck in a time warp and are living in the mid-1960s.

Sorry Griff, the jokes on you! I didn't even exist in the mid 60s. Hahahaha.
As clueless, uneducated, paranoid dinosaurs(you know the same ones who believe 9/11 was an inside job, Man didn't walk on the Moon, chemtrails, etc. etc.) such as yourself become extinct, the only history in the future of these events will be the ones written in stone. Live with it. Thumb1:





JohnM
« Last Edit: Today at 06:55:00 AM by John Mytton »

Offline Zeon Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1373
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #647 on: Today at 08:56:39 AM »
I would have started with Dorothy Garner, questioning her to see if she could estimate her time leaving the 4th floor office, following Adams and Stiles,  in terms of seconds. If Garner was fairly certain it could not have been more than 40 seconds post shots then I would proceed to dismantle the running down stairs part of the WC theory.  If Garner further elaborated on her statement of having heard Adams and Styles going down the stairs with a more precise description such as “I heard their voices as they were going down” then I proceed to further demolish any remaining notion of Oswald having used the stairs to get down to the 2nd floor lunchroom in 75 seconds.

To  completely make it impossible that Oswald could have used either freight elevator to bypass Mrs Garner , I would to establish that if either elevator came down that Garner, Adams, and  Styles would have surely heard the elevator in operation. I would have to question  Jack Dougherty to establish a more coherent statement of his location at the time and get a statement from him that he  neither saw nor heard anyone use either elevator to go down to any lower floor except for himself. This would be difficult but perhaps I could get  a sworn statement from Eddie Piper confirming he saw Jack Dougherty arrive to 1st floor using the West elevator just after Baker and Truly had ascended to the 2nd floor Lunchroom by 90 sec post shots.

After providing this information to a judge, I would ask that the accusation of  Oswald being the 6th floor TSBD shooter be dropped from the prosecutions overall case.

The next phase would be to defend Oswald against the charge of having shot Tippit and to establish Oswald was not in any way a conspirator aiding the TSBD shooter. This would be a difficult task to explain the MC rifle with serial no. Linked to the name Alek Hidell that was sent to Oswalds P.O. Box. I would need consultant CT experts to help me to convince a jury that Oswald was not that stupid. It would probably involve the wallet and the ID , the Blue/ Gray Jacket , the inappropriate prejudicial lineup , and the 1:15 DOA document time of Tippits arrival to the emergency room. It would be an uphill battle, but if enough CT experts could testify, the jury might be confused enough to be uncertain if any of  the evidence was properly handled thus reasonable doubt enough to acquit.

If that fails. On appeal I might try the insanity defense if some reputable Psychologists/ Psychiatrists could establish Oswald was a schizophrenic and suffering from postpartum psychosis because his other personality was a female. To help the odds of finding a kooky jury willing to consider such a preposterous argument, I would seek to have the trial in a woke leftist state and select a jury of similar mental defect as displayed by 11 members of a recent jury who acquitted a woman of having slowly methodically strangling her 3 children because she was suffering from postpartum
psychosis.


« Last Edit: Today at 09:18:09 AM by Zeon Mason »