CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?  (Read 292402 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #511 on: August 14, 2019, 08:41:53 PM »
"Richard" is the guy who keeps bleating "he was photographed with the rifle" over and over again.

"Honest assessment" my aunt Fanny.

 ???

He wasn't photographed with a Carcano?

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #512 on: August 14, 2019, 08:53:07 PM »
???

He wasn't photographed with a Carcano?

How would he know that this is a Carcano at all, much less THE Carcano (the one allegedly found on the sixth floor)?  Or that the Carcano allegedly found on the sixth floor is even the murder weapon for that matter.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #513 on: August 14, 2019, 08:55:17 PM »
Why?  You've never shown a single piece of evidence that Oswald was a shooter, Holmes.

'single piece of evidence'

Now there's a Freudian Slip if I ever saw one, Watson...
« Last Edit: August 14, 2019, 08:57:56 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #514 on: August 14, 2019, 08:59:26 PM »
'single piece of evidence'

Now there's a Freudian Slip if I ever saw one, Watson...

Translation?

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #516 on: August 14, 2019, 09:27:06 PM »
Does anyone understand what Chapman is blathering about now?

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #517 on: August 14, 2019, 10:18:23 PM »
Does anyone understand what Chapman is blathering about now?

Stop dodging