JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
How Good Are People at Counting?
John Mytton:
--- Quote from: John Iacoletti on February 09, 2018, 11:50:25 PM ---They didn't seem to have a problem noticing a much smaller lunch bag.
--- End quote ---
Well duh, of course a lunch bag that could have been used by Oswald would have stuck out like proverbials but a bag on the ground not so much.
JohnM
John Mytton:
--- Quote from: John Iacoletti on February 10, 2018, 12:04:20 AM ---Apparently not if you think McDonald said in that video that Oswald tried to shoot him.
Sorry, but "Oswald carrying his rifle to the crime scene in a brown paper bag" is the thing you're supposed to be proving. You don't just get to state it as a given. The reason I LOL is because you do that all the time. "Oswald's gun bag", "Oswald's rifle', "Oswald's ammunition", ad nauseum.
Are you the same person who whined when somebody called him "Mutton"?
Those who can make coherent arguments do. Those who cannot make up silly nicknames and try to change the subject.
--- End quote ---
--- Quote ---Apparently not if you think McDonald said in that video that Oswald tried to shoot him.
--- End quote ---
Oh I see, so Oswald was trying to fire a warning shot! Nice one!
--- Quote ---You don't just get to state it as a given.
--- End quote ---
Who the hell do you think you are, I go by the evidence!
--- Quote ---"Oswald's gun bag"
--- End quote ---
Oswald's rifle bag had Oswald's prints, Oswald lied about where he put the package and Oswald lied about the contents of the package.
--- Quote ---"Oswald's rifle'
--- End quote ---
Oswald bought C2766, was photographed with C2766 and a rifle with serial number C2766 was found at Oswald work, the same work where Oswald pissbolted at 12:33.
--- Quote ---Are you the same person who whined when somebody called him "Mutton"?
--- End quote ---
Tom resorted to insults as a way to strengthen a weak argument whereas I just shortened your alphabetic surname to something easier to type and in no way intended it as an insult. A huge difference!
--- Quote ---Those who can make coherent arguments do.
--- End quote ---
Irony at its finest!
--- Quote ---Those who cannot make up silly nicknames
--- End quote ---
What like Markham being called "Miss Screwball"? -sigh-
--- Quote ---and try to change the subject.
--- End quote ---
Ok, so by not confronting my question, you've essentially answered it, thanks!
JohnM
Colin Crow:
--- Quote from: John Mytton on February 10, 2018, 03:35:58 AM ---
Well duh, of course a lunch bag that could have been used by Oswald would have stuck out like proverbials but a bag on the ground not so much.
JohnM
--- End quote ---
Of course the lunch bag could belong to the assassin, it was found in the SN. As for the long bag it was found between boxes by Montgomery after he and Johnson were instructed by Fritz to guard the SN. That clearly explains why no one saw it until he extracted the folded bag from between the boxes. If so, why would the Johnson and Montgomery feel the need to lie to the WC?
John Mytton:
--- Quote from: Colin Crow on February 10, 2018, 04:25:35 AM ---Of course the lunch bag could belong to the assassin, it was found in the SN. As for the long bag it was found between boxes by Montgomery after he and Johnson were instructed by Fritz to guard the SN. That clearly explains why no one saw it until he extracted the folded bag from between the boxes. If so, why would the Johnson and Montgomery feel the need to lie to the WC?
--- End quote ---
How about you post the relevant testimony then I'll explain why you're wrong.
JohnM
John Mytton:
--- Quote from: Colin Crow on February 10, 2018, 01:17:58 AM ---LD Montgomery from No More Silence
This revelation from Montgomery explains why no one saw the bag earlier. It was not out in the open but stuffed between boxes. The question is if this is true why did those involved in finding the bag lie when testifying before the WC?
--- End quote ---
Not necessarily, Oswald's brown paper bag may have been out in the open before someone inadvertently moved the large bag out of the way to get a better look for real evidence, then later when they found the rifle they had a brainwave and realized that the innocent looking large bag was in fact real evidence and large enough to carry Oswald's rifle.
JohnM
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version