How Good Are People at Counting?

[John Iacoletti]

Were the officers expecting to find a (folded) gun case made of paper, in a building with boxes wrapped in the exact same paper...

They didn't seem to have a problem noticing a much smaller lunch bag.

[John Iacoletti]

Thanks, that's why some law enforcement officers might have overlooked a brown paper bag.

Or they might have not noticed a brown paper bag because it wasn't there yet.

[John Iacoletti]

Did we watch the same video?

Apparently not if you think McDonald said in that video that Oswald tried to shoot him.

That would be a clever response, if it was 1998.

Sorry, but "Oswald carrying his rifle to the crime scene in a brown paper bag" is the thing you're supposed to be proving.  You don't just get to state it as a given.  The reason I LOL is because you do that all the time.  "Oswald's gun bag", "Oswald's rifle', "Oswald's ammunition", ad nauseum.

Btw Iccy,

Are you the same person who whined when somebody called him "Mutton"?

last time I posted this stat you ran, tell us why you mainly post 8 hours a day 5 days a week and is the pay good?

Those who can make coherent arguments do.  Those who cannot make up silly nicknames and try to change the subject.

[Colin Crow]

LD Montgomery from No More Silence



This revelation from Montgomery explains why no one saw the bag earlier. It was not out in the open but stuffed between boxes. The question is if this is true why did those involved in finding the bag lie when testifying before the WC?

[Bill Brown]

LOL.  Nowhere in that video does McDonald even say that Oswald tried to shoot a cop in the theater.

Oh, yes, he does. If you pay attention to the video McDonald states that he "snapped the pistol" in other words he pulled the trigger. Innocent people certainly don't try to shoot their way out, now do they.

But Paul...

Iacoletti actually believes the snap could have been a theater seat springing to action as someone got up from it.

[John Mytton]

They didn't seem to have a problem noticing a much smaller lunch bag.

Well duh, of course a lunch bag that could have been used by Oswald would have stuck out like proverbials but a bag on the ground not so much.



JohnM

[John Mytton]

Apparently not if you think McDonald said in that video that Oswald tried to shoot him.

Sorry, but "Oswald carrying his rifle to the crime scene in a brown paper bag" is the thing you're supposed to be proving.  You don't just get to state it as a given.  The reason I LOL is because you do that all the time.  "Oswald's gun bag", "Oswald's rifle', "Oswald's ammunition", ad nauseum.

Are you the same person who whined when somebody called him "Mutton"?



Those who can make coherent arguments do.  Those who cannot make up silly nicknames and try to change the subject.

Apparently not if you think McDonald said in that video that Oswald tried to shoot him.

Oh I see, so Oswald was trying to fire a warning shot! Nice one!

You don't just get to state it as a given.

Who the hell do you think you are, I go by the evidence!

"Oswald's gun bag"

Oswald's rifle bag had Oswald's prints, Oswald lied about where he put the package and Oswald lied about the contents of the package.

"Oswald's rifle'

Oswald bought C2766, was photographed with C2766 and a rifle with serial number C2766 was found at Oswald work, the same work where Oswald pissbolted at 12:33.

Are you the same person who whined when somebody called him "Mutton"?

Tom resorted to insults as a way to strengthen a weak argument whereas I just shortened your alphabetic surname to something easier to type and in no way intended it as an insult. A huge difference!

Those who can make coherent arguments do.

Irony at its finest!

Those who cannot make up silly nicknames

What like Markham being called "Miss Screwball"? -sigh-

and try to change the subject.

Ok, so by not confronting my question, you've essentially answered it, thanks!



JohnM