The number one CT nightmare question ...

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The number one CT nightmare question ...  (Read 67687 times)

Offline Jim Brunsman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 131
Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #77 on: June 23, 2019, 11:44:18 PM »
You do not make a compelling case. Besides, there were possibly multiple patsies set up in case Oswald didn't work out. Do your investigation into the attempted assassination weeks earlier in Chicago where they had a patsy all set up and ready to go...

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #78 on: June 24, 2019, 03:50:28 PM »
You do not make a compelling case. Besides, there were possibly multiple patsies set up in case Oswald didn't work out.

How many potential patsies you figure, so that, you know, the bad guys would feel confident they had "all the bases covered" for such an important, one shot (pardon the pun) "op"?

Five?

Ten?

More??

LOL

-- MWT   ;)

PS  Even though they didn't know which one of them patsies they'd end up using until the deed was done, did they let them all wander outside if they wanted to, where they could be "captured" on film during the shooting?

Wasn't that Dirty Commie the authorities were monitoring, Joe Molina, captured on film in Altgens-6 and/or Darnell?

Wuz they plannin' on usin' him if their number one "mark" was sick that day, or had decided to play hooky (they got any zoos in Big D?)? 

You know, so we could invade Russia an' get our casinos back, or somethin'?

Wuz their real "ace in the hole" Big Jack Dougherty?

That vicious little Vicki Adams?

Mrs Robert Reid?

Hey!  Buell Wesley Frazier!  He got an Enfield 30.06, don't he?

 
« Last Edit: June 24, 2019, 06:13:19 PM by Thomas Graves »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #79 on: June 25, 2019, 07:17:50 PM »
Not only that, but by definition, after-the-fact!

You gotta realize that the Dallas Police Department and/or the CIA and/or the FBI and/or military intelligence had updated-by-the-minute contingency plans for framing each and every employee at the TSBD (including that vicious little Vicki Adams) in case only one of 'em (by some fluke in statistical probability) showed up for work that morning, or if only one of 'em (by a different fluke in statistical probability) was out of view of all those dag-blasted cameras, and all those dag-blasted colleagues of their's, like EATIN' A CHEESE SANDWICH, HERMIT-LIKE, INSIDE THE BUILDING, from at least ten minutes before 12 noon (oops, looks like we're gonna have to change that to at least ten minutes before 12:31).

Oh yeah, and we're gonna have to make sure they can each one of 'em walk to 10th and Patton in time to shoot Officer Tippit (who'll be told as early as possible who to be on the lookout for) so we can frame 'em up real good n' proper ...

Oh yeah, and we're gonna have to make sure that each and every one of 'em looks as though they're a Castro-lovin' Communist so it'll look like he (Castro) done ordered the assassination, and then we can Invade Cuba and remove that S.O.B. from power, or, even better, nuke the mo-fo's and start the Nuclear Armeggedon and the Manifest Destiny that's been prophesized in the Old Testament since about 5,000 years after the Earth was formed, by God!

LOL

-- MWT  ;)

The only thing framing the prime suspect was the SN window

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #80 on: June 25, 2019, 09:13:56 PM »
In this thread we have shown that Oswald could not have been framed had he been totally oblivious of any event to take take place that day.

You haven't shown that in any way whatsoever.  You've just speculated on what you thought conspirators would do.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #81 on: June 25, 2019, 09:14:41 PM »
Iacoletti, are you claiming it's possible that sometime after the assassination within a day, they invented enough evidence to arrest Oswald for not one but two murders? WOW!

What makes you think there was enough evidence to arrest Oswald?

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #82 on: June 25, 2019, 09:34:32 PM »
Iacoletti,

You didn't answer my question.

I don't answer loaded questions.  Have you stopped beating your wife?

Quote
Regardless, .... "tainted"?

How so?

Other than the fact that the lineups seemed a bit unfair, can you give me a few examples?

-- MWT  ;)

Sure.  Here's just a few.

- Brennan's change of heart after failing to identify Oswald
- Brennan's alleged ability to see the head shot shooter from the waist up
- Alyea's description of Fritz tampering with the crime scene
- The long bag not appearing in crime scene photos
- Givens' later "recollection" of going back for his cigarettes and seeing Oswald on the 6th floor
- The magic partial palmprint
- No documented chains of custody for the magic bullet, the "limo fragments", the revolver, or the revolver shells
- The February Klein's deposit slip for an alleged March order
- The police "finding" bullets and bus transfer in Oswald's pockets hours after his arrest
- No mention of Oswald's alleged punch in the arrest report
- O.P. Wright's account of a pointed bullet at the hospital
- The Mauser reports
- Whaley's time sheet
- Altered hospital times for Tippit's death
- Drain's two contradictory reports on the characteristics of the paper bag
- The "steel-jacketed" Walker bullet.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #83 on: June 25, 2019, 09:35:56 PM »
Wrong again, Weidman.

(Are you Judge Judy, btw?)

Since Iacoletti had implied that the bad guys, having monitored Oswald closely both before and during the assassination (and thereby noticing that he hadn't gone out of the building so far as to actually get into the sunlight where he could really, really, really be "caught" on film and blow the "op"), decided they wouldn't have to quickly go to "Plan B" and start framing, immediately after-the-fact, Commie Joe Molina, or "Plan C" -- Big Jack Dougherty, or ..... "Plan Z" ... gasp ... that vicious little VICKI ADAMS, after all, and I was wondering how Iacoletti figured the bad guys (the evil, evil, evil DPD and/or the evil, evil, evil CIA and/or the evil, evil, evil FBI) had game-played out all those contingencies, you know, ahead of time, so to speak.

That's a cool story you made up.  But how exactly did I imply any of that?