Oswald is the real assassin

[John Iacoletti]

Again, the truth is not dependent on how many people believe in something. It is a matter of facts and evidence.

Everything on "Mytton's" list is a subjective opinion.  Every . . . thing.

[Thomas Halle]

Yes, indeed, the Katzenbach and Hoover memos suggest some mischief is afoot...and that the reality is NOT simply that the one, essentially "pre-selected" suspect—Oswald--was the sole perpetrator. Something very dark seems to be at work here....and there are people in the Johnson administration (and FBI) who CLEARLY would like to put the JFK assassination matter "to bed" very quickly...w/o further scrutiny or complaint.

[Steve M. Galbraith]

If 99% believed there would be a strong chance I would be one of them......

Why? The facts on an event stand or fall on their own and not whether "X" percent of people believe them. Would you change your view on the assassination based on a poll?

Surely you know that history shows that vast numbers of people, the overwhelming majority in many cases, have believed in things that simply were not true.

[Michael O'Brian]

Why? The facts on an event stand or fall on their own and not whether "X" percent of people believe them. Would you change your view on the assassination based on a poll?

Surely you know that history shows that vast numbers of people, the overwhelming majority in many cases, have believed in things that simply were not true.

To throw the public off I am turning into an Oswald the commie done it believer from now on. I just can't take the bullying anymore, it's not going away you know.

[Bill Chapman]

Why? The facts on an event stand or fall on their own and not whether "X" percent of people believe them. Would you change your view on the assassination based on a poll?

Surely you know that history shows that vast numbers of people, the overwhelming majority in many cases, have believed in things that simply were not true.

Take the Trump base, for instance

[Colin Crow]

Why? The facts on an event stand or fall on their own and not whether "X" percent of people believe them. Would you change your view on the assassination based on a poll?

Surely you know that history shows that vast numbers of people, the overwhelming majority in many cases, have believed in things that simply were not true.

My answer is self evident. Your original premise calls for a 99:1 ratio, ergo the chances for anyone must be strongly in favour of one group over another......doh.....just stating the bleeding obvious.

56 years and the numbers are pretty much what they were. That’s a fact. Can you provide an example where "vast numbers of people, the overwhelming majority in many cases, have believed in things that simply were not true."?

[Thomas Halle]

John...I dunno about his statements being "subjective," but virtually ALL of them are untrue...but merely reflect the (EXTREMELY FLAWED) Official Narrative. The evidence that the M-C carbine was Oswald's is extremely tenuous. E.g., initially NO PRINTS were found on the weapon (Oswald's or ANYONE'S), Maria's testimony reflected a denial that her husband owned a rifle (and only changed later...apparently after being brow-beaten by fed. agents, who reminded her that her staying in the USA might well be dependent upon her testimony). Incidentally, the Warren Commission legal staff noted that Maria's testimony changed dramatically from time to time, and was NOT reliable! This guy insists that LHO said nothing about being elsewhere than on the sixth floor...an absolute untruth, as Oswald said that he'd been on the first floor (and witnesses corroborated this). The shells found near the shooting of the police officer DID NOT match Oswald's revolver, but were from two diff. handguns. It is patently clear that this guy...along with most "Lone Nutter" nuts, I'm sorry to say-- is "coming from" ("a priori") dogma, not from disinterested analysis of the evidence.

BOTTOM LINE, in American criminal jurisprudence, a suspect is considered innocent, unless proven "beyond a reasonable doubt." The evidence against suspect Oswald was ANYTHING BUT compelling and did NOT meet the usual standard. Effectively, Oswald (post mortem) was subjected to "Star Chamber" justice by the Warren Commission. From Dallas to Washington, LHO was the "fall-guy," and he was very quickly dispatched (murdered) (thus avoiding the very inconvenient possibility of his receiving legal counsel, and MAYBE (half-way) legitimate treatment in court. This MUST NOT be allowed to occur, regardless of whatever else developed. QED.

My best to all here. ; )