I haven't met a sane man who knows ALL the important evidence and doesn't find Oswald guilty,
Define "sanity" as "agreeing with 'Mytton', and declare victory. Typical.
Btw while discussing the Lincoln assassination Richard really ripped Iacoletti a new one and exposed the contrarian for what he is, it was hilarious!
No, it was a false equivalence strawman every step of the way. Anything to avoid an honest accounting of the actual evidence in the JFK case.