Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Buell's "off" day (aka: oh yeah)  (Read 46430 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Buell's "off" day (aka: oh yeah)
« Reply #77 on: June 04, 2019, 04:03:00 AM »
Where did I imply that he did?  There you go again, reading something in that wasn't there.
He probably read it from the same source the same as you did.

You didn't present it in such a way that would lead one to think that someone else other than your son originated the punch line.
« Last Edit: June 04, 2019, 06:08:12 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: Buell's "off" day (aka: oh yeah)
« Reply #78 on: June 04, 2019, 04:33:24 AM »
Mack said he always believed there was a conspiracy but lost most of his original zeal when he read conspiracy books and found they left out inconvenient facts, or words to that effect. He still believed that Oswald was involved in a conspiracy, though. CTers continue to claim that he changed his mind about there being a conspiracy.

This is Gary "Badgeman" Mack?

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Buell's "off" day (aka: oh yeah)
« Reply #79 on: June 04, 2019, 06:05:48 AM »
This is Gary "Badgeman" Mack?

Who cares, he was a rabid conspiracy theorist at first*
And a somewhat less-crazed one later
That what I'm addressing

Some things I've mentioned about Mack's 'evolution' as a CT are noted here:
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/news/2013/03/02/gary-mack-and-the-evolution-of-a-jfk-conspiracy-theorist

*He started out as a pretty vicious conspiracy theorist when he was with Channel 5,” said Aynesworth, who never bought into the conspiracy idea. “Gary made some pretty ridiculous claims.”
« Last Edit: June 04, 2019, 06:21:12 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: Buell's "off" day (aka: oh yeah)
« Reply #80 on: June 04, 2019, 09:33:51 AM »
You didn't present it in such a way that would lead one to think that someone else other than your son originated the punch line.

As it happens I thought it was his original quip. I wasn't aware that Billy Connolly had originated it if he did. (Maybe he heard it from my son  :D.

I do apologise if I confused you, Bill, but then that's not very hard to do.
« Last Edit: June 04, 2019, 09:35:29 AM by Ray Mitcham »

Offline Michael O'Brian

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 184
Re: Buell's "off" day (aka: oh yeah)
« Reply #81 on: June 04, 2019, 04:29:53 PM »
Gary’s belief was:  “there may have been a conspiracy but I can’t prove it nor can anybody else”.

Is this an exact quote from Gary Mack?
“there may have been a conspiracy but I can’t prove it nor can anybody else”

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Buell's "off" day (aka: oh yeah)
« Reply #82 on: June 04, 2019, 04:49:23 PM »
As it happens I thought it was his original quip. I wasn't aware that Billy Connolly had originated it if he did. (Maybe he heard it from my son  :D.

I do apologise if I confused you, Bill, but then that's not very hard to do.

Blahblahblahfreakingblah.

Bottom line: You made it look like your son originated the joke. Stop dodging.

Offline Alan Hardaker

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 89
Re: Buell's "off" day (aka: oh yeah)
« Reply #83 on: June 04, 2019, 09:51:22 PM »
Due to the pressure brought to bare on Mr. Frazier by the Dallas Police some parts of his affidavit could easily have been misleading. He could've easily been told by his sister to make sure he distances himself from the evidence or any knowledge of the contents of the sack,due to the attitude of the Police.Hence the misidentification of the sack and saying he never saw Oswald after the murder.

Mr.Frazier wasn't lying to deceive, he was lying because he was scared out of his wits...and who can blame him the way he was treated by the Police.

« Last Edit: June 04, 2019, 09:55:35 PM by Alan Hardaker »