If Charles Givens was such an important witness.....

[John Tonkovich]

If only it were that simple! There are many inconsistencies within the record. Some of these can be chalked up to witnesses changing their minds, or FBI agents failing to accurately reflect what they were told. But not all of them.

Some switcheroos, such as Givens', are obvious lies.

As stated, the give-away is not that his story changed, but that Belin, who'd studied Givens' previous statements, failed to point out that it had changed. And, not only that, that Belin continued to claim Givens' testimony as a key, long after Meagher had pointed out its weakness, and the HSCA had dismissed it entirely.

I would love for someone to analyze the psychology of a man like Belin.
Did he, at some point, forget his actions dummying up the WCR, and start to believe his own myth?

[Jerry Freeman]

Affidavits are not Q&A and thefefore cannot be totally relied upon to tweak one's full recollection, as can a full testimony.

Affidavits ARE sworn statements that ARE relied on to describe one's recollection.
Quit "tweaking" stuff to bolster your already pitiful standpoint...it doesn't work   
You seem eager to readily choose affidavits that support your misguided lone assassin scenario huh?

[Jerry Freeman]

 Why did Givens have to go down to the PD and get questioned for 45 minutes?
Stated he went back to get his hat and coat afterwards. In testimony though, he said he went upstairs to get his coat or jacket before he went to watch the motorcade.

I did not see LHO when the president was shot

Why overstate the obvious?
Click to view full screen---

[Jerry Freeman]

Bump

  Human memory is unreliable. It is normal for people’s story to change over time. 

It is normal for people’s story to change over time.

No it's not. You say that is a fact?...choosing convenient facts over truth?
Lying under oath is perjury.