"I have no qualms" simply means she would state it if it were true and she's willing to consider the possibility. Hardly goes with her no longer maintaining she heard three shots from her left (area of Depository) and that she saw no gunman or gunsmoke from the fence.
I can't find the source of the "qualms" quote. If it's from her 1993 Sixth Floor Museum interview, it is prefaced with:
Q: "What is your analysis of the possibility of a gunman, a second gunman,
being behind that picket fence."
A: "After looking at the film and doing a lot of reading ... etc., I would say
there's a very good possibility there was somebody back there, but they
had a silencer. I don't know who was shooting where, but there was
nobody standing behind that close with a rifle except a silencer on it."
I guess looking at the film means the 1991 "JFK" movie. And she's asked about a "possibility". Not what she actually remembered firsthand, which goes back a long way.
" I talked to Marilyn Sitzman, 202 S. Lancaster who said her boss, Abraham Zaprutes,
RI 8 6071, had movies of the shooting. She said the shots came from that way and
she pointed at the old Sexton Building."
-- Report of Deputy Sheriff John Wiseman, Nov. 23, 1963
(the Depository was formerly known as the Sexton Building)
I see. This is a game to you.
The Zapruder film certainly wasn't altered. And I fail to see how the Soviet Union had any influence on Zapruder.
Couldn't quite keep in those Nazi dog whistles.
Now you're trying to convince me what she said is not important.
How would you know? Then you throw out a picture of her view and act as though she took that very picture.
I thought you would use a picture where they zoom in as you did with Brennan's exaggerated view of the 6th-floor window? What happened to consistency?
You mean to tell me they were making 1980's Chevrolet trucks in the early
1960's. Naturally, I wouldn't think to see smoke 20some years later.
Dogs whistle? I would like to see that, but for now, I don't believe you.
One sec after? haha, Thank God for the bounty of info between the sprocket holes.
Sitzman's inconsistent and you're inconsistent. Those are the facts.
BTW I want to see this dog of yours whistle. I love pet tricks, they made for great entertainment on late night tv, I am sure you would agree