The preponderance of the evidence

[Charles Collins]

It also depends a lot on what you mean by "conspiracy" -- as in accessories after the fact.

Are you making a claim?

[Bill Chapman]

Any other mention made of his 'patsy-ness' by Oswald after the initial outburst... hello? Anyone?

[Martin Weidmann]

I clarified what I meant to say.

Yes, you made it worse?

Now you claim that there was no conspiracy, which is bold statement as well as something you will never be able to know with 100% certainty.

[Charles Collins]

Yes, you made it worse?

Now you claim that there was no conspiracy, which is bold statement as well as something you will never be able to know with 100% certainty.

I made no such claim. Please stop telling me that I said something that I didn?t.

[Bill Chapman]

Because Fritz never said that Oswald refused to pinpoint the actual transaction location.  Did you not read the previous comments?

Did you not read the earlier comments where Martin went on a rant about no one asking Oswald about where he purchased the pistol?

[Martin Weidmann]

I made no such claim. Please stop telling me that I said something that I didn?t.

Huh? That's strange, I could have sworn it was you who said;

Yes a better wording would have been ?there was no conspiracy? instead of he did it alone.

When you agree that a better wording would have been ?there was no conspiracy?, how does that somehow not mean that you agree there was no conspiracy?

[Charles Collins]

Huh? That's strange, I could have sworn it was you who said;

When you agree that a better wording would have been ?there was no conspiracy?, how does that somehow not mean that you agree there was no conspiracy?

The context is that it was part of a sentence. Read the rest of it.