Howard Brennan showed DPD which window the shots had come from

[John Iacoletti]

I assume the guy didn't look like Mr Iacoletti's avatar ..... He didn't look like an evil killer from an old "B" horse sh-- and gun smoke western movie...

Hey, Jerry Organ worked hard on that!

[Martin Weidmann]

It was probably the rifle.. but by all means, feel free to suggest what else the 'something narrow' could have been.

feel free to suggest what else the 'something narrow' could have been.

Michael Paine said he thought it was camping equipment and he actually held the blanket and moved it around several times?.

Are you saying he was wrong?

[Colin Crow]

Using Dishonest John's form of mislogic, no one saw John Wilkes Booth shoot Lincoln.  They heard a bang, looked in that direction, and saw him holding a smoking object made of "wood" pointing at Lincoln's head.  You can't make that kind of nonsense up.  Jackson pointed out the "rifle" and another person saw it.  A search found bullet casings by that window.   John doesn't even believe his own nonsense.  It's Alice-in-Wonderland defense attorney bull.  Just playing the lazy contrarian again.

Who did see the gun discharge at the back of Lincoln's head? Not that I doubt Booth was the perpetrator. I doubt there were many (if any) witnesses to the "gun firing" event. If only Oswald had leapt onto Elm after the shots.

[Richard Smith]

Who did see the gun discharge at the back of Lincoln's head? Not that I doubt Booth was the perpetrator. I doubt there were many (if any) witnesses to the "gun firing" event. If only Oswald had leapt onto Elm after the shots.

Probably no one saw Booth pull the trigger but there is no doubt that he did.  That is the point.  You can make a logical inference.  Someone hears a gunshot and then sees a gun pointed at the person who has just been shot.  What conclusion would a normal person reach?  Maybe that the shot had just been fired from that weapon.  Not that someone else shot Lincoln or that the object being held wasn't a gun but an object made of "wood."  The issue here is whether there was a gunman in the 6th floor window as confirmed by Brennan and others.  The answer is yes.  Does that alone mean Oswald was the assassin?  Of course not.  But that is just the first link in the chain.  The police find a rifle and bullet casings on the floor/window from which witnesses confirm the shots came from.  The second link.  That rifle belongs to Oswald an employee in the building.  The bullet casings found by the window are from his rifle.  More links.  Oswald has no credible alibi for the moment of the assassination.  He flees the building, has a bizarre political background.  He is implicated in another murder less than an hour later.  He resists arrests, lies to the police about his ownership of the rifle.  Under the totality of circumstances and facts, the case is a slam dunk of guilt.  Any counternarrative premised on Oswald being framed or blundering into guilt by, for example, lying about matters that would have assisted his cause by telling the truth are laughable defense attorney tactics to create false doubt regarding a client they know is stone cold guilty.  It's absurd nonsense.

[Walt Cakebread]

Hey, Jerry Organ worked hard on that!

I do hope that Mr Organ doesn't aspire to become another Leonardo da  Vinci.......

[Michael O'Brian]

Probably no one saw Booth pull the trigger but there is no doubt that he did.  That is the point.  You can make a logical inference.  Someone hears a gunshot and then sees a gun pointed at the person who has just been shot.  What conclusion would a normal person reach?  Maybe that the shot had just been fired from that weapon.  Not that someone else shot Lincoln or that the object being held wasn't a gun but an object made of "wood."  The issue here is whether there was a gunman in the 6th floor window as confirmed by Brennan and others.  The answer is yes.  Does that alone mean Oswald was the assassin?  Of course not.  But that is just the first link in the chain.  The police find a rifle and bullet casings on the floor/window from which witnesses confirm the shots came from.  The second link.  That rifle belongs to Oswald an employee in the building.  The bullet casings found by the window are from his rifle.  More links.  Oswald has no credible alibi for the moment of the assassination.  He flees the building, has a bizarre political background.  He is implicated in another murder less than an hour later.  He resists arrests, lies to the police about his ownership of the rifle.  Under the totality of circumstances and facts, the case is a slam dunk of guilt.  Any counternarrative premised on Oswald being framed or blundering into guilt by, for example, lying about matters that would have assisted his cause by telling the truth are laughable defense attorney tactics to create false doubt regarding a client they know is stone cold guilty.  It's absurd nonsense.

What happened in Lincolns case can not be compared to the J.F.K one.
Booth ran for the hills, while Oswald went to the cinema after looking at shoes for his daughter, and according to Milteer someone like Oswald would be picked up to throw the public off.
With firecrackers been  let off in the Plazza and a whole host of other decoys set in place, it is quite obvious that Oswald was innocent and did not even hear the shots which were fired from over in the Dal Tex

[John Iacoletti]

Probably no one saw Booth pull the trigger but there is no doubt that he did.  That is the point.  You can make a logical inference.  Someone hears a gunshot and then sees a gun pointed at the person who has just been shot.  What conclusion would a normal person reach?  Maybe that the shot had just been fired from that weapon.  Not that someone else shot Lincoln or that the object being held wasn't a gun but an object made of "wood."

Marina?s piece of wood was 6 weeks earlier in a different location, Strawman ?Smith?.

The issue here is whether there was a gunman in the 6th floor window as confirmed by Brennan and others.  The answer is yes.  Does that alone mean Oswald was the assassin?  Of course not.

Enough said.

But that is just the first link in the chain.  The police find a rifle and bullet casings on the floor/window from which witnesses confirm the shots came from.

No witness ?confirmed? that shots came from there.

The second link.  That rifle belongs to Oswald an employee in the building. 

. . . and that?s where your argument falls apart.