A straight line

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: A straight line  (Read 337180 times)

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: A straight line
« Reply #42 on: February 06, 2018, 04:19:57 PM »
                                                           
                                                           SITCOM WORTHY MATERIAL

         Lt. Day should have Never left CSI Green Horn Studebaker alone in the TSBD. This is like leaving Gomer Pyle in charge of the Ammo Dump.

Lt J.C. Day was no Dick Tracy.....   He was more like Trick Dacy...and didn't even know the difference between a bolt action rifle and a lever action rifle...

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5020
Re: A straight line
« Reply #43 on: February 06, 2018, 05:34:12 PM »
Lt J.C. Day was no Dick Tracy.....   He was more like Trick Dacy...and didn't even know the difference between a bolt action rifle and a lever action rifle...

                   
Or a Mauser vs a Carcano ???

Offline Pat Speer

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 88
Re: A straight line
« Reply #44 on: February 06, 2018, 10:00:26 PM »



Different Limo!

TRY AGAIN!!!



JohnM

Specter had Thomas Kelley testify regarding the adjustments made on May 24, 1964, to assure the stand-ins were in the same alignment as Kennedy and Connally.

Mr. SPECTER. And what adjustment was made, if any, so that the relative positions of those two men were the same as the positioning of President Kennedy and Governor Connally on November 22, 1963?
Mr. KELLEY. The officials at Hess Eisenhardt, who have the original plans of the President's car, conducted a test to ascertain how high from the ground a person 72 1/2 inches would be seated in this car before its modification. And

132

it was ascertained that the person would be 52.78 inches from the ground--that is, taking into consideration the flexion of the tires, the flexion of the cushions that were on the car at the time.
Mr. SPECTER. When you say 52.78 inches, which individual would that be?
Mr. KELLEY. That would be the President.
Mr. SPECTER. And what part of his body?
Mr. KELLEY. The top of the head would be 52.78 inches from the ground. When Mr. Anderton was placed in the followup car, it was found that the top of his head was 62 inches from the ground. There was an adjustment made so that there would be--- the stand-in for Governor Connally would be in relatively the same position, taking into consideration the 3-inch difference in the jump seat and the 2-inch difference in his height.
Mr. SPECTER. Considering the 3-inch difference in the jump seat--and I believe it would be an inch and a half difference in height between President Kennedy and Governor Connally--how much higher, then, approximately, was President Kennedy sitting than the Governor on November 22?
Mr. KELLEY. I am not----
Mr. SPECTER. Would the President have been about an inch and half higher than the Governor on the day of the assassination?
Mr. KELLEY. The day of the assassination, yes.
Mr. SPECTER. And were----
The CHAIRMAN. Wouldn't the height of these men depend upon the length of their torso?
Mr. KELLEY. Well----
The CHAIRMAN. You have some people who are shortwaisted, some people who are longwaisted. I don't know which either of these men were who were of the same height. But I know there is a lot of difference in men. We sometimes see the--a man who looks large sitting down, when he stands up he is small, because he has a long torso, and vice versa.
Mr. KELLEY. Of course the relative positions are apparent from the films that were taken at the time of the assassination. It would be, of course, that judgment---and it would have to be a judgment. But I think the films indicate there was just about that much difference in their height when both were seated.
Mr. SPECTER. Inspector Kelley, I hand you a photograph marked as Commission Exhibit No. 697, which has heretofore been admitted into evidence, and identified by Governor Connally as depicting the President and the Governor as they rode in the motorcade on the day of the assassination, and I ask you if the stand-ins for the President and the Governor were seated in approximately the same relative positions on the reconstruction on May 24.
Mr. KELLEY. Yes., sir; in my judgment that is very close.

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5133
Re: A straight line
« Reply #45 on: February 06, 2018, 11:32:08 PM »
Specter had Thomas Kelley testify regarding the adjustments made on May 24, 1964, to assure the stand-ins were in the same alignment as Kennedy and Connally.

Mr. SPECTER. And what adjustment was made, if any, so that the relative positions of those two men were the same as the positioning of President Kennedy and Governor Connally on November 22, 1963?
Mr. KELLEY. The officials at Hess Eisenhardt, who have the original plans of the President's car, conducted a test to ascertain how high from the ground a person 72 1/2 inches would be seated in this car before its modification. And

132

it was ascertained that the person would be 52.78 inches from the ground--that is, taking into consideration the flexion of the tires, the flexion of the cushions that were on the car at the time.
Mr. SPECTER. When you say 52.78 inches, which individual would that be?
Mr. KELLEY. That would be the President.
Mr. SPECTER. And what part of his body?
Mr. KELLEY. The top of the head would be 52.78 inches from the ground. When Mr. Anderton was placed in the followup car, it was found that the top of his head was 62 inches from the ground. There was an adjustment made so that there would be--- the stand-in for Governor Connally would be in relatively the same position, taking into consideration the 3-inch difference in the jump seat and the 2-inch difference in his height.
Mr. SPECTER. Considering the 3-inch difference in the jump seat--and I believe it would be an inch and a half difference in height between President Kennedy and Governor Connally--how much higher, then, approximately, was President Kennedy sitting than the Governor on November 22?
Mr. KELLEY. I am not----
Mr. SPECTER. Would the President have been about an inch and half higher than the Governor on the day of the assassination?
Mr. KELLEY. The day of the assassination, yes.
Mr. SPECTER. And were----
The CHAIRMAN. Wouldn't the height of these men depend upon the length of their torso?
Mr. KELLEY. Well----
The CHAIRMAN. You have some people who are shortwaisted, some people who are longwaisted. I don't know which either of these men were who were of the same height. But I know there is a lot of difference in men. We sometimes see the--a man who looks large sitting down, when he stands up he is small, because he has a long torso, and vice versa.
Mr. KELLEY. Of course the relative positions are apparent from the films that were taken at the time of the assassination. It would be, of course, that judgment---and it would have to be a judgment. But I think the films indicate there was just about that much difference in their height when both were seated.
Mr. SPECTER. Inspector Kelley, I hand you a photograph marked as Commission Exhibit No. 697, which has heretofore been admitted into evidence, and identified by Governor Connally as depicting the President and the Governor as they rode in the motorcade on the day of the assassination, and I ask you if the stand-ins for the President and the Governor were seated in approximately the same relative positions on the reconstruction on May 24.
Mr. KELLEY. Yes., sir; in my judgment that is very close.


Thanks Pat under the circumstances they did an admirable job but there was a few details that needed precision...

The CHAIRMAN. Wouldn't the height of these men depend upon the length of their torso?
Mr. KELLEY. Well----


.....because without those exact measurements and positions, they ended up with a scenario which is close but for further analysis requires a certain amount of predictable correction.





JohnM


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5020
Re: A straight line
« Reply #46 on: February 07, 2018, 12:53:40 AM »
DEFINITION OF TERMS
                                           
"predictable correction" = SPECULATION = SBT

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5133
Re: A straight line
« Reply #47 on: February 07, 2018, 01:48:35 AM »

                                                   DEFINITION OF TERMS
                                           
                                       "predictable correction" = SPECULATION = SBT




Glad to SEE YOU back and CAPITALIZING words at RANDOM!

Quote
"predictable correction" = SPECULATION = SBT

speculation
ˌspɛkjʊˈleɪʃn/Submit
noun
1.
the forming of a theory or conjecture without firm evidence.


Sorry Storing but the following comparison GIF is not a theory but is firm evidence that you can see with your own two eyes and when we focus on Kennedy and his stand in from Zapruder's position we can calculate where Connally was seated.



Using the above information, from Oswald's view we can see that the SS had Connally too high.





And to top it off, at this exact moment in time when the two men were precisely lined up we see a violent simultaneous reaction. What's left to argue?





JohnM
« Last Edit: February 07, 2018, 01:50:18 AM by John Mytton »

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5133
Re: A straight line
« Reply #48 on: February 07, 2018, 04:38:16 AM »
shot in the back...






Yet another Capasse misrepresentation. Are you proud of yourself?

You have started your gif @Z228 a mere fraction of a second after the single bullet fact and what you are showing is just the continued reaction. Here's the entire sequence showing one continuous motion.





JohnM