A straight line

Author Topic: A straight line  (Read 229236 times)

Offline Steve Taylor

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 94
Re: A straight line
« Reply #520 on: April 12, 2018, 02:50:00 PM »
Advertisement
That is false.
Mr. Specter: Assuming some factors in addition to those which you personally observed, Dr. Baxter, what would your opinion be if these additional facts were present: First, the President had a bullet wound of entry on the right posterior thorax just above the upper border of the Scapula with the wound measuring 7 by 4 mm. in oval shape, being 14 cm. from the tip of the right acromion process and 14 cm. below the tip of the right mastoid process--assume this is the set of facts, that the wound Just described was caused by a 6.5 mm bullet shot from approximately 160 to 250 feet away from the President, from a weapon having a muzzle velocity of approximately 2,000 feet per second, assuming as a third factor that the bullet passed through the President's body, going in between the strap muscles of the shoulder without violating the pleura space and exited at a point in the midline of the neck, would the hole which you saw on the President's throat be consistent with an exit point, assuming the factors which I have Just given to you?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #520 on: April 12, 2018, 02:50:00 PM »


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1903
Re: A straight line
« Reply #521 on: April 12, 2018, 03:56:42 PM »
Mr. Specter: Assuming some factors in addition to those which you personally observed, Dr. Baxter, what would your opinion be if these additional facts were present: First, the President had a bullet wound of entry on the right posterior thorax just above the upper border of the Scapula with the wound measuring 7 by 4 mm. in oval shape, being 14 cm. from the tip of the right acromion process and 14 cm. below the tip of the right mastoid process--assume this is the set of facts, that the wound Just described was caused by a 6.5 mm bullet shot from approximately 160 to 250 feet away from the President, from a weapon having a muzzle velocity of approximately 2,000 feet per second, assuming as a third factor that the bullet passed through the President's body, going in between the strap muscles of the shoulder without violating the pleura space and exited at a point in the midline of the neck, would the hole which you saw on the President's throat be consistent with an exit point, assuming the factors which I have Just given to you?

exited at a point in the midline of the neck

That's Specter making an assumption of his own. It's not from the autopsy report itself.

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1282
Re: A straight line
« Reply #522 on: June 03, 2025, 06:02:46 AM »
One can get [the SBT] to work.  It is just that one cannot get it to work and fit the evidence. The angle at Z-225 is 9 degrees, so the right-to-left travel is less.  But at Z225, JBC had turned around to face forward.  With JBC facing forward it is even harder to get the right armpit over to the left so that it is 4 inches farther left than JFK's throat.

JFK and JBC had probably just been hit in Z-223.

JBC was turned far to his right in Z-223.


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #522 on: June 03, 2025, 06:02:46 AM »


Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1282
Re: A straight line
« Reply #523 on: June 03, 2025, 07:07:00 AM »
Dougherty said Oswald was empty-handed when he entered the shipping room door.

Iacoletti,

Did Dougherty say that, or did he say he didn't see anything in Oswald's hands?

Didn't he say that he was sitting on the wrapping table and that he just caught Oswald "out of the corner of his eye" when he came in the door?
« Last Edit: June 03, 2025, 07:27:43 AM by Tom Graves »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #523 on: June 03, 2025, 07:07:00 AM »