A straight line

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: A straight line  (Read 336992 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: A straight line
« Reply #434 on: March 26, 2018, 10:38:36 PM »
That one is easy. JBC was NOT sitting in the middle of his seat. The ITEK analysis has him as much as 8.6 inches inboard of Kennedy.

...and as little as 4.2 inches.  Not much help there.  Besides, Itek based this on their positions at Z183 and Z188.

Quote
I wasn't aware that the WC came to that conclusion. It's hard to see how they could have, since Kennedy can't be seen in Z223. Kennedy does not show a reaction until between Z225 and Z226.

Why were his arms already raised?
« Last Edit: March 26, 2018, 11:20:25 PM by John Iacoletti »

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: A straight line
« Reply #435 on: March 26, 2018, 10:50:23 PM »
...and as little as 4.2 inches.  Not much help there.

As usual ,you are wrong. "As much as 8.6 inches" is quite helpful.

 
Quote
Besides, Itek based this on their positions at Z183 and Z188.

They also utilized stereo pairs from 183-187, and 189-193.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: A straight line
« Reply #436 on: March 26, 2018, 11:00:04 PM »
Just because someone says they're innocent doesn't mean they're innocent.

Some of what I post is tongue-in-cheek, Alice. St.John the Virtuous once accused me of believing Oswald quilty only because no other shooter could be shown. So, I naturally countered with an equally nonesensical notion that CTers believe Oswald innocent because he said he was. Tit for tat.

« Last Edit: March 27, 2018, 03:30:50 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: A straight line
« Reply #437 on: March 26, 2018, 11:23:28 PM »
As usual ,you are wrong. "As much as 8.6 inches" is quite helpful.

It's only helpful if you can show the SBT works for 4.2 inches as well.
 
Quote
They also utilized stereo pairs from 183-187, and 189-193.

That's great, but do you think the single bullet happened between 183-187 or 189-193?

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: A straight line
« Reply #438 on: March 26, 2018, 11:24:32 PM »
Some of what is tongue-in-cheek, Alice. John once accused me of believing Oswald quilty only because no other shooter could be shown.

That's because the only response you ever give in support of your opinion is "name your shooter".

Offline Alice Thorton

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: A straight line
« Reply #439 on: March 27, 2018, 12:55:33 AM »
I am not sure about that.   Many CTers say that Oswald was a "patsy" and, as far as I can tell, the only evidence that he was a patsy came from Oswald himself.

Yes, I have seen that as well. News has a direct quote from Oswald saying that himself.

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: A straight line
« Reply #440 on: March 27, 2018, 01:02:20 AM »
It's only helpful if you can show the SBT works for 4.2 inches as well.

Wrong. It's helpful in that it allows me to position Connally as much as 8.6 inches inboard of Kennedy if I need to.
 
Quote
That's great, but do you think the single bullet happened between 183-187 or 189-193?

Z193 was about 1.6 seconds before the shot. The positions of the two would have changed very little in that small amount of time.