A straight line

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: A straight line  (Read 336504 times)

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8171
Re: A straight line
« Reply #28 on: February 05, 2018, 09:12:47 AM »
It's a nice one, isn't it. Tom Dillard snapped it at Love Field.





So, now you have to move Kennedy further to the side of the car to make it work?

« Last Edit: February 05, 2018, 09:20:39 AM by Martin Weidmann »

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8171
Re: A straight line
« Reply #29 on: February 05, 2018, 09:17:49 AM »
It is indeed Jerry. Rotate Connally 30 degrees to the right and move Kennedy's right arm inboard and down and you'll have their relative positions at the time of the single bullet strike. It's an awesome photo. Why haven't I seen it before?

Tim,

You don't have a clue about the relative positions of Kennedy and Connally at the time of the shooting. All you are doing is shifting them around to a point where you think the SBT would work. In other words, you are manipulating the evidence to fit a predetermined conclusion.
« Last Edit: February 05, 2018, 09:28:18 AM by Martin Weidmann »

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5118
Re: A straight line
« Reply #30 on: February 05, 2018, 09:27:26 AM »
Tim,

You don't have a clue about the relative positions of Kennedy and Connally. All you are doing is shifting them around to a point where you think the SBT would work. In other words, you are manipulation the "facts" to fit a predetermined conclusion.



Quote
You don't have a clue about the relative positions of Kennedy and Connally

The Zapruder film with a reasonable amount of accuracy gives us the relative positions of Kennedy and Connally.

Quote
All you are doing is shifting them around to a point where you think the SBT would work. In other words, you are manipulation the "facts" to fit a predetermined conclusion.

You must be joking, Tim's scientific methodology is precisely how you solve problems, you deal with the parameters and you match it against the known evidence.



JohnM




Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8171
Re: A straight line
« Reply #31 on: February 05, 2018, 09:30:49 AM »


The Zapruder film with a reasonable amount of accuracy gives us the relative positions of Kennedy and Connally.

You must be joking, Tim's scientific methodology is precisely how you solve problems, you deal with the parameters and you match it against the known evidence.

JohnM

Tim's scientific methodology is precisely how you solve problems, you deal with the parameters and you make it match it against the known evidence.

There, I fixed it for you

Now what about that straight line from the 6th floor window to the limo? You can place the limo anywhere you like in the center lane, so why don't you give it a try?


« Last Edit: February 05, 2018, 12:50:28 PM by Martin Weidmann »

Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: A straight line
« Reply #32 on: February 05, 2018, 09:36:43 AM »
Perhaps Mr Mytton with his excellence in providing doctored photos could mark on the copy of the autopsy sheet where he thinks the bullet that he believes entered at the place marked 14 cos below the mastoid, exited JFK's body.

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5118
Re: A straight line
« Reply #33 on: February 05, 2018, 09:56:32 AM »
Perhaps Mr Mytton with his excellence in providing doctored photos could mark on the copy of the autopsy sheet where he thinks the bullet that he believes entered at the place marked 14 cos below the mastoid, exited JFK's body.







JohnM

Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: A straight line
« Reply #34 on: February 05, 2018, 03:43:47 PM »






JohnM

So you agree that the entrance hole shown on the autopsy sheet is much lower than the alleged exit hole in the throat.

Seems we are making progress.