Was Lee Oswald the passenger in Whaley's Taxi?

[John Iacoletti]

C'mon Johnny...... You should know that ad hominem  isn't very effective....and it reveals that the person using it has just been knocked on his arse....and is desperately trying to respond....

And you telling me that some crap that you invented as my belief demonstrates my inability to reason is not ad hominem?  You think that anybody who doesn't swallow your fabrications is irrational.

[Walt Cakebread]

And you telling me that some crap that you invented as my belief demonstrates my inability to reason is not ad hominem?  You think that anybody who doesn't swallow your fabrications is irrational.

Oh No, that's not true.....But when facts are presented ( like the 85 cent fare) that is Not a fabrication... whereas the official tale that Lee Oswald was Whaley's passenger IS a fabrication....

[John Iacoletti]

Oh No, that's not true.....But when facts are presented ( like the 85 cent fare) that is Not a fabrication... whereas the official tale that Lee Oswald was Whaley's passenger IS a fabrication....

There's no evidence beyond Oswald's say so that he paid an 85 cent fare to anybody.  Just like there's no evidence beyond Oswald's say so that he changed his shirt.  You're free to speculate and assume, but don't go calling them facts.  You're doing just what the LNers do.

I have no trouble with the postulation that Whaley's passenger was somebody else -- his story is full of inconsistencies.  That doesn't entitle you to make stuff up to support it.

[Walt Cakebread]

There's no evidence beyond Oswald's say so that he paid an 85 cent fare to anybody.  Just like there's no evidence beyond Oswald's say so that he changed his shirt.  You're free to speculate and assume, but don't go calling them facts.  You're doing just what the LNers do.

I have no trouble with the postulation that Whaley's passenger was somebody else -- his story is full of inconsistencies.  That doesn't entitle you to make stuff up to support it.

Let me get this straight..... You accept the nonsense handed to you by the authorities and do not call them fabrications ...even though an intelligent and reasoning person can clearly see that they are fabrications.....

But if someone exposes their lie by producing plausible evidence that they were lying like the 85 cent taxi fare then that person id "making stuff up"....   Do I have this right? 

[John Iacoletti]

But if someone exposes their lie by producing plausible evidence that they were lying like the 85 cent taxi fare then that person id "making stuff up"....   Do I have this right?

No, not even close.  What you call "plausible evidence" is just stuff that you completely invent out of whole cloth because you think it's "reasonable".  Like the whole Brennan west window thing.

[Walt Cakebread]

No, not even close.  What you call "plausible evidence" is just stuff that you completely invent out of whole cloth because you think it's "reasonable".  Like the whole Brennan west window thing.

So you accept the fabricated tale that was created by LBJ's Special Blue Ribbon Committee that was based on William Whaley's obvious Bull Stuff.....   While rejecting  the statement of Lee Oswald that he paid a taxi driver 85 cents to transport him to the rooming house even though Lee would have had no reason to invent the taxi ride.

[John Iacoletti]

So you accept the fabricated tale that was created by LBJ's Special Blue Ribbon Committee that was based on William Whaley's obvious Bull Stuff.....   While rejecting  the statement of Lee Oswald that he paid a taxi driver 85 cents to transport him to the rooming house even though Lee would have had no reason to invent the taxi ride.

Who said I accept the WC version?  That doesn't automatically mean that your fabricated tales win.  Do you have some evidence that Oswald paid anyone 85 cents for a taxi ride?  Who was this cab driver (and don't say Darrel Click)?  Where is his log sheet?