Humor me

[Martin Weidmann]

Paulie? Billy?  The conspiracy community must be cringing each time this clown posts.

I actually know for a fact that they are laughing?. as they should when clowns like you are involved

You are entertaining for a little while but you will never be any more than that

[Paul May]

I actually know for a fact that they are laughing?. as they should when clowns like you are involved

A fact? Must be the same type of ?fact? you need for a conspiracy in the JFK event.  One more non existent fact. This is to damn easy lol.

[Martin Weidmann]

A fact? Must be the same type of ?fact? you need for a conspiracy in the JFK event.  One more non existent fact. This is to damn easy lol.

I don't need any fact for a conspiracy?. it's all the same to me. I just want to know what really happened.

So, you just show me a "fact" that Oswald is guilty and acted alone and I'll gladly accept it.... but you can't, can you now?

You've got nothing more than hot air and a bad attitude, but that's already well known fact for anybody who you've been in contact with.

You are getting pretty tiresome with your overinflated ego and your inability to even defend the crap you believe in.

[Paul May]

I don't need any fact for a conspiracy?. it's all the same to me. I just want to know what really happened.

So, you just show me a "fact" that Oswald is guilty and acted alone and I'll gladly accept it.... but you can't, can you now?

You've got nothing more than hot air and a bad attitude, but that's already well known fact for anybody who you've been in contact with.

Totality of circumstantial evidence and Oswald?s consciousness of guilt are two issues conspiracy nuts can not over come. Those are the facts. Your own ignorance in stating a direct evidence case is stronger one more time shows those reading this exchange understand your inability to reason critically and demonstrates once again your total ignorance of the evidence in this case. You seek confirmation bias as the majority of ignorant people do. You cannot even garner support on this thread.  How pathetic are you ?Marty?.

[Martin Weidmann]

Totality of circumstantial evidence and Oswald?s consciousness of guilt are two issues conspiracy nuts can not over come. Those are the facts. Your own ignorance in stating a direct evidence case is stronger one more time shows those reading this exchange understand your inability to reason critically and demonstrates once again your total ignorance of the evidence in this case. You seek confirmation bias as the majority of ignorant people do. You cannot even garner support on this thread.  How pathetic are you ?Marty?.

bla bla bla   

More of the same arrogant "I know better and you are ignorant" crap. What isn't there is just one straight forward argument to support your case.

Don't you ever get tired of yourself?

[Paul May]

bla bla bla   

More of the same arrogant "I know better and you are ignorant" crap. What isn't there is just one straight forward argument to support your case.

Don't you ever get tired of yourself?

Last response.  I?ve debated, over 50+ years intelligent, well versed CT?s who actually knew the evidence and disputed said evidence.  They could propose no argument for conspiracy and said so.  You?re to effen stupid to even consider that. You?re a clown who with each posting demonstrates to ALL your desire to waste peoples time. I know longer play that game. I prefer golf.  It?s more challenging.  Good riddance.

[Martin Weidmann]

Last response.  I?ve debated, over 50+ years intelligent, well versed CT?s who actually knew the evidence and disputed said evidence.  They could propose no argument for conspiracy and said so.  You?re to effen stupid to even consider that. You?re a clown who with each posting demonstrates to ALL your desire to waste peoples time. I know longer play that game. I prefer golf.  It?s more challenging.  Good riddance.

I?ve debated, over 50+ years intelligent, well versed CT?s 

Sure you have.. there is just no trace of it anywhere on line

They could propose no argument for conspiracy and said so.

So what? Is it your pathetic argument that - even it was true - that means that "Oswald did it alone" wins by default?

I know longer play that game. I prefer golf.  It?s more challenging.  Good riddance.

And yet you are still here, posting crap on a frequent basis.... very believable? and btw, you don't even know how to play golf.