Humor me

[Alan Ford]

So, the question is:  why is this material to the case against Oswald?

 

So, the question is: why did you claim that both of the dates on this official Crime Scene Search Section form are wrong? What grounds did you have for pushing such an extraordinary notion?

[John Iacoletti]

Huge difference. History has recorded Oswald as the assassin. Try reading non fiction as opposed to conspiracy theory. You may learn something.  Nah, you won?t.

?History has recorded?. 

What does that even mean?

Try reading non-fiction as opposed to the Warren Report. You may learn something. Nah, you won?t.

[John Iacoletti]

And this minor piece of nothing means what to you?  The relevance is?  You believe this singular piece of nonsense offsets EVERY piece of physical evidence proving Oswald as the sole shooter?

All ZERO of them?

[John Iacoletti]

So, a cop or cops got dates wrong.

And you know these dates are wrong, how exactly?

[Alan Ford]

And you know these dates are wrong, how exactly?

It's almost as though Mr May can't justify such an extraordinary claim!

[Mark A. Oblazney]

It's almost as though Mr May can't justify such an extraordinary claim!

why don't you just talk about what went on in the middle ages?  tis' far more interesting, am so jealous the wealthy had such a good time.  back in the day.  but oswald killed kennedy, tis' true without lying, certain and most true...... sorry, hermes.  and kennedy's tale has already been written, though not cast in (Oliver) stone, perhaps....... sigh+

[Richard Smith]

Mr.Ford, my question, which you keep avoiding is:  what do you believe this is ?evidence? of?  A simple question I would think as you?ve posted it numerous times.

Alan just posts the form over and over noting that March 15 comes before March 23 as though that proves something.  He appears to be contending that Oswald took curtain rods to the TSBD on Nov. 22.  Those rods were found by some unknown person and the authorities then successfully suppressed them to promote the conclusion that Oswald carried a rifle instead of curtain rods in his bag.  For some inexplicable reason that Alan refuse to address, the same authorities who successfully suppress these curtain rods in an effort to frame Oswald then decided bring them to light five months later to test them for Oswald's prints!  LOL.  And conveniently fill out this form to document the evidence they have gone to great pains to suppress.  Oswald helps them out by, again inexplicably, denying not only that he had any curtain rods but that he even carried a long bag that morning.  Alan apparently refuses to acknowledge that perhaps Ruth Paine brought the curtain rods in her garage to the notice of the WC or DPD before her interview and that they were taken from her garage to check Oswald's story to Frazier that he had gone there for curtain rods.  Then replaced in the garage for the purpose of her testimony.   The fact that the form contains the same WC exhibit number referenced in Paine's later testimony is consistent with that narrative and if there were any doubt Ruth Paine herself confirms these curtain rods were taken from her garage and that they had been there since the assassination (i.e. they were not recovered elsewhere).