Humor me

[Martin Weidmann]

Conspiracy cannot be eliminated to a 100% certainty yet I?ve seen no hard credible evidence for it in 56 years.

All it takes not to see "hard credible" evidence is to dismiss whatever is being offered as not credible.

[Richard Smith]

Nothing about hearing cartridges hitting the floor in the earliest interview.

That's right!....  And I believe that IF ? Mr Norman had actually heard the sound of shells hitting the floor in conjunction with the sounds of a rifle bolt being operated and the boom of the discharge....He wouldn't have been standing there scratching his head and wondering what he'd heard....He would probably said something like "Hey! ...There's someone firing a rifle right above us.... Let's get outta here"....

Norman didn't start talking about shells hitting the floor until the FBI questioned the three stooges a couple of days after the coup d e'tat.  They "re-enacted" the THEORY  about the shooting while Hero Hank was on the fifth floor straining to hear the sounds they were making in "re-enacting the shooting"   That's when the sounds were actually introduced into Hank's memory banks.

Great example of CTer dishonesty.  Noting that there is "nothing about cartridges hitting the floor" to cast doubt on Norman's account when his statement clearly indicates that "he thought the shot had been fired from the floor directly above him."  Norman believes the shots came from above him to such an extent that he actually looks up to see what is going on and, incredibly, for this reason (checking where he believes the shots came from) his account is then further discounted because in Walt's subjective opinion he should have acted differently.  LOL.  We also know that other witnesses see a rifle sticking out of the 6th floor window at the moment of the assassination to corroborate his account.  And why would he lie about any of this?  Add yet another potential member to the large conspiracy these same CTers deny they are claiming while falsely and dishonestly suggesting that everyone lied to implicate Oswald.

[Walt Cakebread]

Conspiracy cannot be eliminated to a 100% certainty yet I?ve seen no hard credible evidence for it in 56 years.

Maybe you should open your eyes.......

[Ray Mitcham]

Conspiracy cannot be eliminated to a 100% certainty yet I?ve seen no hard credible evidence for it in 56 years.

As the old saying goes, "There are none so blind as those who will not see."

[Bill Chapman]

As the old saying goes, "There are none so blind as those who will not see."

Waiting for your killer & conspiracy to show up...

[Robert Reeves]

Ever been to the Plaza, Robert?  Ever lit a firecracker there?  It is an echo chamber....... chamber.

Nope, I've NOT been to Dealey Plaza. I get what you're saying -- but gut instincts tell me there's legit honesty coming from those that testified to hearing the fatal head shot *sequence* in quick-succession ... on top on each other ... David Von Pein's *few* witness accounts of hearing equal spacing shots fired I just feel uncomfortable accepting - as fact - because I know I can't trust certain personalities testimony in the JFK assassination. I admit bias. I believe there was significant intimidation/manipulation targeted towards those that strayed from the narrative of the FBI/Warren Report. Won't even pretend otherwise, I am easily written off as being affected by confirmation bias. - that those that publicly spoke of the fatal head shot coming *audibly* in a tightly-spaced-grouping-of-shots are more compelling to me.

[Paul May]

Maybe you should open your eyes.......

The late Gary Mack sums it up nicely:  ?there may have been a conspiracy to kill JFK, but I cannot prove it nor can anybody else?.