BWF and LMR may not have been the only ones who saw LHO with a bag on 11/22/1963

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: BWF and LMR may not have been the only ones who saw LHO with a bag on 11/22/1963  (Read 328718 times)

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5197
Nope!....  I take the meds as ordered...maybe I'll be one of the few would survive cancer....

Huh? Plenty of people survive cancer, I know a few cancer survivors.
Just do what they tell you and you'll be alright!

JohnM

Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Walt,

If you truly are at war with the big C then I wish you the best. My Uncle is currently in remission.  Keep taking the meds and do some research on diet. If I was faced with such a battle , I would remove all sugar from my diet. Also, water fasting can do wonders.

For once I agree totally with Tim. Best of luck, Walt, and as Tim says drop the sugar from your diet as much  as you can as tumours feed on sugar. You tried Cannabis oil? I can recommend it as a treatment.

Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Nope!....  I take the meds as ordered...maybe I'll be one of the few would survive cancer....

Sorry to hear this Walt. 

Get Well Soon.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
For once I agree totally with Tim. Best of luck, Walt, and as Tim says drop the sugar from your diet as much  as you can as tumours feed on sugar. You tried Cannabis oil? I can recommend it as a treatment.

Keep your myths to yourself

Myth: People with cancer shouldn't eat sugar, since it can cause cancer to grow faster.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/cancer/in-depth/cancer-causes/art-20044714

Fact: Sugar doesn't make cancer grow faster. All cells, including cancer cells, depend on blood sugar (glucose) for energy. But giving more sugar to cancer cells doesn't speed their growth. Likewise, depriving cancer cells of sugar doesn't slow their growth.

This misconception may be based in part on a misunderstanding of positron emission tomography (PET) scans, which use a small amount of radioactive tracer ? typically a form of glucose. All tissues in your body absorb some of this tracer, but tissues that are using more energy ? including cancer cells ? absorb greater amounts. For this reason, some people have concluded that cancer cells grow faster on sugar. But this isn't true.

However, there is some evidence that consuming large amounts of sugar is associated with an increased risk of certain cancers, including esophageal cancer. It can also lead to weight gain and increase the risk of obesity and diabetes, which may increase the risk of cancer.
« Last Edit: April 15, 2019, 07:15:50 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Keep your myths to yourself

Myth: People with cancer shouldn't eat sugar, since it can cause cancer to grow faster.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/cancer/in-depth/cancer-causes/art-20044714

Fact: Sugar doesn't make cancer grow faster. All cells, including cancer cells, depend on blood sugar (glucose) for energy. But giving more sugar to cancer cells doesn't speed their growth. Likewise, depriving cancer cells of sugar doesn't slow their growth.

This misconception may be based in part on a misunderstanding of positron emission tomography (PET) scans, which use a small amount of radioactive tracer ? typically a form of glucose. All tissues in your body absorb some of this tracer, but tissues that are using more energy ? including cancer cells ? absorb greater amounts. For this reason, some people have concluded that cancer cells grow faster on sugar. But this isn't true.

However, there is some evidence that consuming large amounts of sugar is associated with an increased risk of certain cancers, including esophageal cancer. It can also lead to weight gain and increase the risk of obesity and diabetes, which may increase the risk of cancer.

Yep. The experts said the Titanic was unsinkable, and in the fifties, they said that smoking was good for you.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Yep. The experts said the Titanic was unsinkable, and in the fifties, they said that smoking was good for you.

Ah, the dreaded 'they'
The boogeymen of the paranoia-afflicted everywhere.

What 'experts' are you referring to? The real experts would be those who designed and built the ship, and if you read the news of the day 'practically unsinkable' was a term often used. Show us where the Titanic was actually advertised as being 'unsinkable'

Concerns about health re smoking started in the thirties and in retaliation, tobacco companies enlisted doctors as spokesmen. Big full-colour ads filled magazines with glowing endorsements from the 'men in white'.
« Last Edit: April 15, 2019, 08:26:04 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
What 'experts' are you referring to? The real experts would be those who designed and built the ship, and if you read the news of the day 'practically unsinkable' was a term often used. Show us where the Titanic was actually advertised as being 'unsinkable'

" White Star Line Vice President P.A.S. Franklin announced ? We place absolute confidence in the Titanic. We believe the boat is unsinkable.?

I note you said nothing about smoking causing cancer.
« Last Edit: April 15, 2019, 08:22:10 PM by Ray Mitcham »