BWF and LMR may not have been the only ones who saw LHO with a bag on 11/22/1963

[John Mytton]

Keep wriggling, Mr Mytton-----everyone's watching!

 

Sorry Alan but I don't have a "theory" that's in desperate need of supporting evidence.
I see a date that was written in error because as I contend each section was written at different times and the document that Colin posted 100% reinforces my original hypothesis that dates were written at different times. Case closed. Try again.

JohnM

[Tim Nickerson]

So you conclude that both Howlett and Day signed a form on two occasions that had the wrong date of submission of the evidence. Could both of then be so sloppy? Do you think they do not even read the documents they put their signature to in such an important case? It was an eight day mistake.....an error of 800% if signed on the 24th.

I consider whoever marked in the dates to be sloppy. I've signed numerous documents without noting the dates on them , unless I was the one writing the dates on them.

[Tim Nickerson]

Sorry Alan but I don't have a "theory" that's in desperate need of supporting evidence.
I see a date that was written in error because as I contend each section was written at different times and the document that Colin posted 100% reinforces my original hypothesis that dates were written at different times. Case closed. Try again.

JohnM

Yeah, I think you solved this one. It would have been nice though if Day had taken the time to correct the March 15 date when he marked in March 26 on the copy. Oh well.

[Alan Ford]

I see a date that was written in error because as I contend each section was written at different times and the document that Colin posted 100% reinforces my original hypothesis that dates were written at different times. Case closed. Try again.

JohnM

 

Question: How can you tell when a Warren Worshipper is bluffing?
Answer: He declares 'Case Closed'!

Now, Mr Mytton, we already know that the document was written at different times:
-------------when a piece of evidence is being signed in, the date and time are recorded 
-------------when the same piece of evidence is being signed out, the date and time are recorded 

There were rules around this, standard procedure. An official Crime Scene Search Section evidence form-----despite your best efforts to convince us otherwise-----was rather more formal and official an affair than a personal diary.

So!

The question is: How do you account for the existence of two different release dates on the two different versions of the official Crime Scene Search Section form, yet the same submission date?

 

[John Mytton]

Yeah, I think you solved this one. It would have been nice though if Day had taken the time to correct the March 15 date when he marked in March 26 on the copy. Oh well.

Thanks Tim, also a piece of supporting evidence is the following dated form where Day examined the curtain rods on the 25th which is the perfectly applicable date for curtain rods received on the 24th.



JohnM

[Alan Ford]

I consider whoever marked in the dates to be sloppy. I've signed numerous documents without noting the dates on them , unless I was the one writing the dates on them.

 

Are you a law enforcement official, Mr Nickerson, with special responsibility for investigating the death of your President?

[Tim Nickerson]

Are you a law enforcement official, Mr Nickerson, with special responsibility for investigating the death of your President?

No, I'm not. But I do regularly sign off on deliveries worth more than $30,000. The two curtain rods that Howlett removed from the Paine garage on Mar 23 were worthless.