BWF and LMR may not have been the only ones who saw LHO with a bag on 11/22/1963

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: BWF and LMR may not have been the only ones who saw LHO with a bag on 11/22/1963  (Read 314661 times)

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5140
Amazingly, you will also find a photo/document, which shows the reverse side of rod 275, which is dated 3-25-64, one day after the release date!?!

https://texashistory.unt.edu/explore/collections/JFKDP/browse/?q=curtain&t=fulltext&sort=

Nice pickup, did Alan ever explain how this confliction of dates applies to his strict chronological theory?



JohnM

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Thanks Denis, you've saved me some time and yep this is just yet another crazy theory that doesn't pass any logic test.

JohnM

 :D

Ah yes, the dangers of jumping into a discussion without having done one's homework!

Mr Pointing's explanation of the Crime Scene Search Section form was as follows, Mr Mytton:

------------the dates & times on the form are accurate
------------Agent Howlett and Mr Jenner conspired to put on an elaborate (and illegal) hoax whereby they only pretended to find the 2 curtain rods in the Paine garage on 23 March.

As to why Agent Howlett and Mr Jenner would do all this just for the sake of a meaningless fingerprint test, Mr Pointing had no answer to offer.

You happy with Mr Pointing's explanation, Mr Mytton?

 Thumb1:

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Nice pickup, did Alan ever explain how this confliction of dates applies to his strict chronological theory?



JohnM

Where is the 'confliction of dates', Mr Mytton?

 Thumb1:

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5140
:D

Ah yes, the dangers of jumping into a discussion without having done one's homework!

Mr Pointing's explanation of the Crime Scene Search Section form was as follows, Mr Mytton:

------------the dates & times on the form are accurate
------------Agent Howlett and Mr Jenner conspired to put on an elaborate (and illegal) hoax whereby they only pretended to find the 2 curtain rods in the Paine garage on 23 March.

As to why Agent Howlett and Mr Jenner would do all this just for the sake of a meaningless fingerprint test, Mr Pointing had no answer to offer.

You happy with Mr Pointing's explanation, Mr Mytton?

 Thumb1:

Quote
Ah yes, the dangers of jumping into a discussion without having done one's homework!

I said I never read the thread and simply made some observations, where's the danger in that?

Quote
Mr Pointing's explanation of the Crime Scene Search Section form was as follows, Mr Mytton:

------------the dates & times on the form are accurate
------------Agent Howlett and Mr Jenner conspired to put on an elaborate (and illegal) hoax whereby they only pretended to find the 2 curtain rods in the Paine garage on 23 March.

Didn't Denis say and emphasised that it was just another possibility?

Quote
As to why Agent Howlett and Mr Jenner would do all this just for the sake of a meaningless fingerprint test, Mr Pointing had no answer to offer.

I don't find it very plausible that after many months in probably the most focused on building in the country that "curtain rods" were suddenly found, but if you believe it then good luck to you. And btw if curtain rods were found it would most likely be a prank much like the souvenir shells put out for the gullibles behind the grassy knoll fence, as they say a sucker is born every minute.

JohnM
« Last Edit: April 13, 2019, 12:09:21 PM by John Mytton »

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5140
Where is the 'confliction of dates', Mr Mytton?

 Thumb1:





JohnM

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
I said I never read the thread and simply made some observations, where's the danger in that?

Didn't Denis say and emphasised that it was just another possibility?

Yes!  Thumb1:

Unfortunately, however, countering a coherent hypothesis (2 curtain rods showing up the Depository and thus warranting testing for Mr Oswald's fingerprints) with an incoherent hypothesis (Agent Howlett and Mr Jenner conspiring to hoax the American people for no discernible reason whatsoever) is a rather unconvincing way to undermine the coherent hypothesis!

Quote
I don't find it very plausible that after many months in probably the most focused on building in the country that "curtain rods" were suddenly found,

Why not?

Quote
but if you believe it then good luck to you. And btw if curtain rods were found it would most likely be a prank much like the souvenir shells put out for the gullibles behind the grassy knoll fence, as they say a sucker i born every minute.

 :D

The pranksters thought to put the digits '275' and '276' on the prank white enameled rods many days before Mr Jenner elected to designate the Paine white enameled rods 'Ruth Paine Exhibit 275' and 'Ruth Paine Exhibit 276'?

If you believe that, Mr Mytton, then good luck to you!

Thumb1:

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820