BWF and LMR may not have been the only ones who saw LHO with a bag on 11/22/1963

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: BWF and LMR may not have been the only ones who saw LHO with a bag on 11/22/1963  (Read 314632 times)

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
If Ruby's prints were found on the two curtain rods might that not be indicative of something interesting?   ???

But we know from the Crime Scene Search Section form that all Lieutenant Day cared about was whether or not Mr Oswald's prints were on the curtain rods!  Thumb1:



What else you got?


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
LOL...What? Was he sharing his toothbrush as well?  ???

With his doppelg?nger* Lee Harold Oswald [AKA Dirty Harold].
 ;)

*Kind of like the good/bad versions of the FBI agent in David Lynch's Twin Peaks (2017)




Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
But we know from the Crime Scene Search Section form that all Lieutenant Day cared about was whether or not Mr Oswald's prints were on the curtain rods!  Thumb1:




Doesn't belong to which Oswald? Harvey, Lee or Harold?  :D

Maybe it was Ruby's.

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
With his doppelg?nger* Lee Harold Oswald [AKA Dirty Harold].
 ;)

*Kind of like the good/bad versions of the FBI agent in David Lynch's Twin Peaks (2017)

I wonder how Armstrong missed Harold.

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Doesn't belong to which Oswald? Harvey, Lee or Harold?  :D

(~Shrug~)

You really aren't doing very well here, are you, Mr Nickerson?  :(

What else you got?

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
(~Shrug~)

You really aren't doing very well here, are you, Mr Nickerson?  :(

What else you got?

I've got the same as you. It's a bunch of foolishness. The only difference is that you believe the nonsense that you spout. When I present nonsense here, I know that it's foolishness.

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
I've got the same as you. It's a bunch of foolishness. The only difference is that you believe the nonsense that you spout. When I present nonsense here, I know that it's foolishness.

 :D

All I've done, Mr Nickerson, is present this:



All you've done is throw makey-uppy numbers and nonsensical scenarios at it in a wild and rather desperate bid to explain away its obvious significance.

But at least you---------unlike craven blowhards like Messrs. May, Galbraith and von Pein----------gave it a shot. I, and I'm sure many others reading, applaud you for that. Twas a noble failure!  Thumb1:

On the off-chance you're still interested in playing, you might get around to answering my question about which of the items below, taken from the Paine home during the 23 March WC visit, were submitted to Lieutenant Day by Agent Howlett for fingerprinting...



 Thumb1: