BWF and LMR may not have been the only ones who saw LHO with a bag on 11/22/1963

[John Iacoletti]

I'm 100% positive that Oswald was the LN in the SN who shot and killed POTUS and wounded JBC and murdered Officer Tippit.

That and $5.00 will get you a coffee at Starbuck's.

[Oscar Navarro]

I guess you missed this particular part:

"I didn't pay much attention to the package other than I knew he had it under his arm"

You don't have to accurately estimate anything to see how it is being carried or how much of the back seat it takes up.

But the thing you don't realize is that no matter how hard to try to discredit Frazier and Randle, they were the only ones who saw the bag, and they said that CE 142 was not it.  No matter how hard to try to discredit Frazier and Randle, you have ZERO evidence that a rifle was in that bag or in CE 142.

I guess you haven't read the OP. There's a Mrs. Roberts who might have seen "Oswald carrying a package long enough to carry a rifle". That's three people who saw Oswald carrying a bag that wasn't his lunch. And, apparently, you don't have any idea how circumstantial evidence works.

[Oscar Navarro]

Thank you, Mr Navarro!

Now!

Which curtain rods precisely do you believe these were which the SS submitted to the DPD for fingerprinting on 3/15/64? Where did they come from?

 

The Paine garage.

[Oscar Navarro]

That and $5.00 will get you a coffee at Starbuck's.

I can get coffee for half that at Sergio's. Cuban coffee at that not that muddy water served at that overhyped and overpriced joint.

[Oscar Navarro]

You have already decided what's what. But none of that proves anything in a scenario where Oswald is truly innocent. If he's truly guilty, then people can review all of these uncommon Oswald actions and easily see a pattern.

If he's truly guilty? Do you seriously have any doubts that Oswald shot JFK, JBC and Tippit?

[Alan Ford]

The Paine garage.

Thank you, Mr Navarro! 

Now!

The visit by the WC (accompanied by Agent Howlett) to the Paine home, during which two curtain rods belonging to Ms Ruth Paine were inspected and taken away, did not take place until March 23.

Would you agree with the statement that March 15 came before March 23?

If so, how do you explain the fact that----in your own words----"The SS requested the DPD to fingerprint the curtain rods on 3/15/1964"?

 

[John Iacoletti]

I guess you haven't read the OP. There's a Mrs. Roberts who might have seen "Oswald carrying a package long enough to carry a rifle". That's three people who saw Oswald carrying a bag that wasn't his lunch. And, apparently, you don't have any idea how circumstantial evidence works.

In your mind, the way evidence works is that a "package large enough to carry a rifle" (whatever that means) cannot carry a lunch? Must be some weird lunch bag legislation in Dallas that I'm unaware of.  How many of these people said that the bag they saw wasn't a lunch?

If you think "long bag" is even circumstantial evidence of a rifle, then you're the one who doesn't understand evidence.